Opinion 
 Blogs 
 Out Here 
 The 'roo needs revision 

The 'roo needs revision

There's something missing in the discussion about kangaroo farming to beat climate change: fat.

I once interviewed the late R.M. Williams about his time in the Flinders Ranges during the Depression. RM, his wife and young son lived under canvas in the Flinders for several years while he worked as a bore sinker. When they could get it, they lived on rabbit, wallaby and goat, all of it lean meat.

RM recalled that his family's desperation for fat was so dire, they would go and ask for spare sheep fat from station homesteads.

"You can't live without fat," he said.

Along with sweetness, humanity has always craved fat. It's the secret ingredient of Maccas and KFC, and it drives the beef feedlot industry.

Yes, the "low fat" food industry is huge. So is our population, and it's getting huger. The craving for fat, it seems, is stronger than our desire to eat low-fat products.

Eating more roo meat is a worthy objective, but roo farming can't replace domestic livestock.

Livestock are the product of thousands of years of careful breeding to suit our fat-hungry tastebuds.

With kangaroo, we in one bound go back to eating wild pig, or the scrawny wild chickens I've seen scratching under the rhododendrons of the Himalayas.

For some Middle Europeans, who like their game, this might be a good thing.

The rest of us want fat—and not be reminded too strongly of the animal we're eating.

I enjoy the occasional feed of roo, although some have been a bit gamey for my pampered taste. But roo is now on the shelves of our local supermarket and I find, like most of my fellow shoppers, that I'm passing the dark, stringy, lean meat in favour of something that is none of these things.

If we’re serious about roo farming, we'll need to start with a breeding program and kangaroo EBVs for marbling and tenderness.

The original product is a miracle of nature's engineering, and superbly adapted to this continent.

But for extended shelf space in the supermarket, it needs work.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
When will people ever realise that kangaroos can't be "farmed"! They can't be handled, yarded or transported. They are wildlife. They can only be killed by stalking them and blasting them with a shotgun! The cost of fencing would be prohibitive as they are nomadic animals. Why can't we accept that kangaroos are our iconic emblems and should be left alone as part of our ecology. They are small anyway, and could have parasites and diseases. We don't need animal fats and we don't need meat! A post-carbon age will be meat-free, or virtually, so leave kangaroos alone.
Posted by Vivienne on 26/11/2008 3:47:17 PM
Well said in regards to the myths in kangaroo farming..totally ridiculous..ask any cattle farmer. We will also see a lot more Allergies from people eating roo meat..it's called kangaroo anaphylaxis and fact of cases reported. Don't think enough tests have been done on the safety of eating roo meat. Russia banned the meat because they found Ecoli in the kangaroo carcasses. Too risky.
Posted by valleygirl on 26/11/2008 7:04:03 PM
Roo requires more fossil fuel to be burned per kilo than beef or mutton. The vehicles used for harvesting roo's compact the ground more than sheep and cattle. The people that advocate this bulldust have no concept of the realities of what they espouse.
Posted by Brindi on 26/11/2008 7:59:14 PM
there are 101 reasons why we should not eat kangaroos. The main one being the cruelty involved in killing these beakutiful animals. Man will do anything to make money. We are without a doubt the most cruel of species. We have a choice!
Posted by sylvia on 27/11/2008 9:48:01 AM
Iconic animals not to be eaten? Good grief the french eat chook and brazilians beef so don't come the raw prawn here!
Posted by zulu on 28/11/2008 9:11:28 AM
something else missing in the discussion of eating meat is the fact that kangaroos are on track to extinction. Are we all so brainwashed to think that in spite of the worst drought in 100 yrs, bushfires, floods, farmer kills, illegal hoon killings, road kill, government 'culls' and the general loss of food and water due to habitat loss that kangaroos even have a chance? Did you know that the average age of a kangaroo killed by the commercial industry is barely out of the pouch and not even reproductive age because they have shot out the biggest roos? That up to 80% are females? The killing is out of control and they are on the brink. Check out government statistics on http://www.stopkangarookilling.org and sign our petition demanding a moratorium until a full independent enquiry is carried out determining extinction risk to kangaroos. Wake up Australia, the wool is well and truly over your eyes ... kangaroos are not pests - sheep and cows are! There are 5 times as many sheep as there are roos and more cows and we all know they do more damage to the environment. The solution is simple - as Viviene said, adopt a plant based diet! We are eating the planet to death and driving all species to extinction. It is incumbent on each one of us to make a change. Thank you!
Posted by Menkit on 30/11/2008 7:29:50 AM
There is enough fat in a plant based diet to satisfy human tastes. We don't need to thoughtlessly kill everything that moves for survival. We no longer live in caves. “It’s embarrassing for Australia that we eat our own wildlife … I’m here to tell you it’s not right ... simply do not buy, use or eat kangaroo products.” Steve Irwin In honour of Steves memory at least look at the facts: http://www.animal-lib.org.au/campaigns/kangaroo-campaign.htm
Posted by Pamela on 30/11/2008 10:07:31 AM
In a perfect world, for me as a vego, no animal would have to lose its life for human tummies. The fact that kangaroos, lives which have regulated themselves and added to the balance of nature in this country for thousands of years, are bearing the brunt of a 200 year old smeer campaign by apathetic or ignorant folk is tragic. If we don't learn to appreciate our wildlife right now, this country will have nothing of unique value and nothing to be proud of.
Posted by Mel on 30/11/2008 6:16:59 PM
Its sad to read the comments posted in relation to the consumption of kangaroos, the writers have totally lost contact with the land and the natural system. Our landscape evolved around human and animal impact , Unfortunatly by introducing water to large areas of Australia with the coming of poly pipe we created a monster for our selves. Kangaroo have benefited greatly from this and numbers asre huge and by constructing the dog fence we took away one of their natural predictors.Prof Gaurnut report was not far from the mar, unfortunately media and organizations took it as FARMING KANGAROOS this is impossible, they will be managed as they are presently running free in conjunction with domestic stock. Lest hope there are some radical people out there who have a big influence in the media and have lost touch with the natural system.
Posted by concerned on 1/12/2008 6:32:15 AM
Wow all those pessimists with no can do attitude. Perhaps everyone is opposed to eating kangaroo need to realise there are currently more kangaroos in Australia than before white man settled due to established water points. I think that is something overlooked. The roo offers a low carbon healthy meat resource and, though it would take a few generations, could be domesticated and farmed. Cattle and horses weren't domesticated over night. Humans will always eat meat despite what the vegans promote. Try having a few kangaroos as pets and you will see how they can be domesticated. Farming kangaroos is an option but needs to be structured and yes include a breeding program. Stopping bringing emotions into the argument and view it on tangible facts.
Posted by Support Roo Farming on 4/12/2008 8:37:53 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Matt Cawood is based in the NSW New England region and is the science and environment writer for the Rural Press group of weekly agricultural newspapers.

Q: Do you believe the new board of Australian Wool Innovation can heal the rifts within the industry?

Yes
(26.9%)

No
(56.6%)

Undecided
(16.4%)

Total Votes: 438
Poll Date: 24/11/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...