News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Fertiliser prices on the rise: Incitec 

Fertiliser prices on the rise: Incitec

30 Jul, 2009 06:29 AM
NEW Incitec Pivot chief James Fazzino has foreshadowed a period of further consolidation for the company while welcoming signs of a rally in the world fertiliser market.

Mr Fazzino, 43, the company’s chief financial officer since 2003, was yesterday appointed managing director and chief executive of Incitec Pivot, a position he had filled on an acting basis since the resignation of Julian Segal in May.

Mr Fazzino told BusinessDay that the decline in fertiliser sales and prices seemed to be over.

"We have seen more firmness in fertiliser prices," he said.

"To put that in context, DAP (diammonium phosphate) last year was $US1200 a tonne. It bottomed at $US260 and it's about $US290 today.

"That makes sense because fertiliser use is discretionary.

"You can cut back today, but what you don't use today you must use in future years."

Mr Fazzino said Incitec's strategy, with four immediate priorities, was mapped out.

First was zero harm.

"Basically, you ensure people don’t injure themselves," he said.

"That's always the first priority when you're dealing with heavy chemicals and explosives."

Second, the company had to deliver on the Dyno acquisition.

"That's all about the Velocity program — the efficiency program. We're on track to deliver $204 million of benefits by 2011."

Third, Mr Fazzino said, Incitec had to increase the cost position and reliability of its plants, especially in North America.

"We sell commodities and must be at the bottom of the cost curve," he said.

The fourth priority will be to focus on the Moranbah project.

Incitec has slowed building of the $935 million ammonium nitrate plant at Moranbah in Central Queensland because of weaker demand.

Mr Fazzino said the split in company earnings between explosives and fertilisers would remain about 50:50.

"We end up with a far better stream of cash flows with an explosives business in the mix," he said.

In May, Incitec Pivot downgraded its full-year profit guidance and reported a six-month profit of $99.6 million, down 41 per cent from last year, due to weaker demand for explosives and fertiliser.

Incitec's shares closed 8¢, or 2.9 per cent, lower at $2.68.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Fazzino may well claim that fertiliser use is discretionary...well so is what supplier farmers choose to get fertiliser from. There will be an increasing number who will use their discretion and chose not to get their needs from Incitec.

Mr Fazzino, where in your strategies are the needs of your customers? No where! Its all about Incitec the company.

Posted by Gecko, 31/07/2009 8:22:10 AM
In other words, Mr Fazzino is saying that because Incitec bottomed out with their shares 'big time' they need to make up for lost dollars and make their executors rich again. This is what they call 'goodwill' nowadays - for the company, not the customer!
Posted by Lee-anne, 31/07/2009 9:45:46 AM
With world fert prices on the rise, I bet that Incitec will not be tardy increasing their prices. When the global fert price fell dramatically they claimed that they couldn't drop prices as quick as they still had stock bought at the higher price. OK. I have a feeling that the reverse will now not apply. World price goes up 10%, so does Incitec's immediately, despite having stock bought at the lower price - if this is not gouging then what is? Bet also that when an enquiry is done, it will be found to be above board. I for one, will never buy their products again - my discretion!
Posted by The orchardist, 1/08/2009 9:08:55 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Has the Federal Government got the balance right between water buybacks and investment in more efficient irrigation infrastructure in the Murray Darling?

Yes
(3.8%)

No - there should be more investment in infrastructure
(73.8%)

No - there should be more emphasis on water buybacks
(13.7%)

Undecided
(8.7%)

Total Votes: 416
Poll Date: 26 July, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...