News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Finance 
 Great Southern project manager insolvent 

Great Southern project manager insolvent

10 Jun, 2009 06:19 AM
THE corporate offshoot charged with running Great Southern's managed investment schemes is insolvent and has no cash available to complete its forestry and horticulture projects.

Investigations undertaken by McGrathNicol, the receivers of the collapsed timber investment company, have indicated that the responsible entity of the Great Southern group will have to be wound up because of its financial position.

Great Southern Managers Australia (GSMA) is understood to have insufficient reserves and no chance of securing additional funds to continue in its role of managing the group's 45 schemes. GSMA was the body with direct responsibility for the schemes that over the past 10 years raised $2.3 billion from 43,000 investors attracted by the tax advantages of the group's managed investment projects.

But Great Southern's slide into administration last month after running up debts of $600 million has left the group's investor growers facing an uncertain future, especially as GSMA is no longer in a position to support their schemes.

Their situation mirrors that of the 18,500 investor growers in the rival managed investment company Timbercorp, which collapsed in late April owing creditors $900 million.

Timbercorp's responsible entity was found to be "hopelessly insolvent" by the administrators, KordaMentha, which estimated that at least $300 million in new capital was required to maintain its 24 almond and olive tree growing schemes.

Both McGrathNicol and Great Southern's administrators, Ferrier Hodgson, are now assessing the financial status of each of its projects to work out which are viable and which have little chance of surviving.

They will eventually fall into three categories: those that can be harvested and even produce a decent return for their investors in line with original forecasts; those that may still be viable with the support of a new and financially strong responsible entity to manage them; those that will have to be wound up.

The oldest of Great Southern's schemes, including its 1998 and 1999 pulpwood forestry operations that are about to be harvested, are the least affected by the company's collapse.

But the prospects of those that followed, and in particular its most recent schemes, is less certain with some investors now having to face up to the fact there is little value left in their horticultural holdings.

The receivers and administrators hope to be in a position over the next three months to give a view about the best outcome for each scheme. However, Great Southern's complex financial structure and the multitude of investment schemes means that it might not be before the end of the year before investor growers get to vote on what should happen to their individual projects.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Can't we get you guys some decent photos of plantations so you can stop using images of quality native forest. They are like chalk and cheese, one is grown by real farmers on real farms using time tested, low impact, regeneration techniques that provide real habitat and a real market return to local communities. And the other is grown by blow-ins, on tax farms, for urban spivs, and funded by the gullible, producing third rate habitat, a dubious return and leaves an unusable paddock behind. Using a native forest photo for a plantation forest story is highly defamatory to the native forest and their owners.
Posted by Ian Mott, 11/06/2009 10:31:38 AM
Obviously, it is time for the community (our government) to buy up all the forest plantation land at the current fire-sale prices. Then they can stop logging native forests and sending species extinct. Unfortunately, Forests NSW, Victoria and Tasmania are government enterprises where the same level of greed, incompetence and lack of realism that we saw at Great Southern is hidden behind complex subsidy systems. This a rare moment when we can reorganise the forestry industry and introduce sound, sustainable practices.
Posted by Heckler from Ourimbah, 11/06/2009 12:20:03 PM
When are we going to see justice as these groups? Maybe the Tax Office and ASIC have a lot to answer for also. If it was a lonely old farmer or small business, the book would have been thrown at them
Posted by petro, 11/06/2009 4:56:56 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 June, 2009
04 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Senate reject the federal Government's proposed Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) legislation?

Yes, reject it: the Senate should vote against the legislation passed last week by the House of Representatives.
(62.7%)

No, vote for it: the legislation should be passed by the Senate.
(11.6%)

Postpone it: Senate should wait till after Copenhagen Summit.
(25.7%)

Total Votes: 723
Poll Date: 08 June, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...