News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Ag research spending should be akin to national defence 

Ag research spending should be akin to national defence

23 Jun, 2009 10:37 AM
IT'S time for world leaders to see agricultural and food research as defence spending, with fears a massive decline in agricultural research is one of the main drivers of food insecurity.

Professor Julian Cribb, from the University of Technology Sydney, yesterday told delegates at the National Farmers Federation congress in Brisbane that world food supply and demand were precariously balanced.

And he said that despite the growth in factors leading to massive food shortages, the world's research response was severely lacking.

Professor Cribb said the demand for food is forecast to grow by 110 per cent by the middle of this century.

Yet producing enough food for all those people would be hard to achieve because of the reduced availability of land and water to support food production for that booming population.

He said that for the first time in history city demand for water is outpacing farm demand throughout the world, and by 2050 urban demands might exceed the total amount of water currently used in irrigation.

Meanwhile, the world is also currently losing about one per cent of its productive land each year because of degradation and the spread of the world's urban area, which now covers half the area of China or the United States.

By 2050 the world's urban area will be larger than either of those great countries.

Yet despite these factors, international funding for agricultural research has been stagnant in real terms, Professor Cribb said, since the early 1970s – when the population of the world was less than half what it is today.

"In leading agricultural countries, like the US, Germany, Australia, Britain and China, agricultural research is actually shrinking," Professor Cribb said.

"We've actually witnessed here the axing of our own national Land and Water research agency – a national disgrace, I volunteer – and ongoing cuts in CSIRO and in various State agricultural departments means the knowledge you need to farm better and more sustainably is starting to dry up.

"At present we're spending about $30 billion a year on agricultural research (worldwide) to raise the world food supply.

"It is chicken feed compared to the $1.3 trillion that we spend every year on weapons."

Professor Cribb said world leaders have lost sight of the fact that the world's 1.9 billion farmers, fishers and foresters manage two-third's of the world's land area, three-quarters of its water and much of its biodiversity and a third of the atmosphere.

"You are the most important people on the planet," he said.

"It is time we see agriculture and food research as defence spending – despite the climate, the outlook for Australian agriculture and trade over the coming decades is bright, however our greatest opportunity and responsibility is to export our science, technology and skills to a world that desperately needs it."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I agree completely with Julian Cribb's comments, but the problem is that these facts are not being reported in the mainstream urban media. Farmers and graziers can complain all they want, but city people are simply not listening. And therefore politicians are not listening either and not taking action.
Posted by Bruce, 23/06/2009 2:40:59 PM
I agree with the Professor Cribb, but point out that there has been massive wastage of funding thrown away on GMO research. For many reasons GMOs are not the answer and the sooner this is understood the better. Research must focus on sustainable, environmentally friendly systems that produce nutritionally rich food without the use of toxic chemicals. Is the current chemical rescue method of farming a clandestine attempt at population growth? What I don't understand is that little is mentioned of limiting population growth. If a farm has a carrying capacity of 10,000 sheep and the farmer tries to run 20,000, what happens? The other is the loss fertile productive land to urban development. Planting houses on rich fertile soil is totally unacceptable and must be stopped. I do appreciate that this places constrains on the owners of this type of land.
Posted by ggwagga, 24/06/2009 6:50:57 AM
Cribb only sees the Agricultural R&D investment at a the government/public science front and ignores the investment by private industry R&D companies. Cribb is a promoter for investment into schemes that have not delivered value to farmers. Agricultural research is not a priority to public science agencies, eg. CSIRO. The NFF needs to focus on the R&D capacity within industry and the current investment by private industry into agricultural research. Farmer organisations could divert farmer funds for R&D into the private sector and achieve far greater value for money. Farmer organisations could at least tender out all R&D rather than just hand over farmer dollars to R&D Corporations (eg, GRDC) where much of the money ends up in the pockets of public workers. NFF needs to control the direction of agricultural R&D and not rely on government initiatives. Private companies can access government R&D and innovation funds through AusIndustry and the R&D Tax Concession scheme.
Posted by Mangiri, 24/06/2009 8:11:39 AM
Fairfax Media, Prof Cribb and Mangiri should read the research by Prof Julian Alston, University of California Professor of Agricultural and Resource Economics. He actually analysed USA R&D in food and agriculture over the past 120 years. He found a 16 to 20 benefit cost ratio, i.e. much better than other investments. He also found a 15 to 25 year period before peak returns occurred. Productivity gains averaged over 2.2% per year until about 1970 and have been half that since. In other words even if R&D was increased today it would be the next generation that would see the benefits.

Mangiri needs to open his eyes. From 1955 to 1985 State Governments in Australia paid 80% of the R&D&E in Australian Agriculture. The focus on high status CSIRO and University R&D is misplaced as it is just to easy to bag Govt employees who cannot defend themselves.

Now that most State Governments have exited the field to enable the private sector to move in (read Hilmer Report) we see the private sector unable to commit as they seek easy speculation e.g. MIS schemes, housing etc. The wool industry is a case in point, the big investors don't want to support R&D or promotion, just keep the money for themselves. So much for the private sector. Adios rural Australia.

Posted by Annoyed, 24/06/2009 10:35:23 AM
You've got to be kidding. Defence spending is about the strategic ability to kill people. Agricultural research is about the ability to enhance standards of living.
Posted by whatever, 24/06/2009 10:50:05 AM
You won't get our moronic politicians - or city people either for that matter - to sit up and take notice until they are hungry !!! I think then, maybe it will be a bit late !! So maybe the answer is keep spending on weapons and killing people and you won't have to grow as much food !!! Isn't that a lovely thought.
Posted by Jeff, 24/06/2009 4:44:25 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Professor Julian Cribb, from the University of Technology Sydney
Professor Julian Cribb, from the University of Technology Sydney
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
22 June, 2009
21 June, 2009
19 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Is the Grains Council of Australia worth saving?

Yes
(31%)

No
(50.9%)

Undecided
(18.1%)

Total Votes: 332
Poll Date: 21 June, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...