News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Biofuels not to blame for higher food prices 

Biofuels not to blame for higher food prices

14/11/2008 3:00:00 AM
A group of leading ethanol producers from around the US launched a new US organisation, Growth Energy, at a press conference today.

The group will be dedicated to promoting clean, green ethanol as America's best renewable fuel that is high-tech and homegrown, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the nation's dependence on foreign oil.

The group is also launching a new advertising campaign "to set the record straight on food prices."

The campaign comes at a time when corn prices have fallen by more than 50pc and oil prices have been tumbling, while food prices continue to soar.

Yet, the group points out, US cost of food has increased at the brisk clip of 7.6pc in the past year - the worst rate in nearly 20 years.

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that the price of basic foods in the US is currently rising at twice the rate of inflation.

It is expected to continue to rise in the future.

Milk prices increased by 13.3pc; cheese by 12.5pc; eggs by 29.9pc; and bread by 14.7pc from March 2007 through March 2008.

A statement from Growth Energy claims Big Food is harvesting profit growth from these higher prices.

Kraft's revenues, for instance, increased nearly 20pc from the year-earlier period and saw net income shoot up in the third quarter to $1.4 billion.

Sales at Kellogg's climbed 9.5pc and third-quarter net income increased to $342 million, up from $305 million the year earlier.

Dave Vander Griend, CEO of ethanol group ICM, says, "Our current low priced corn, high-priced food economic situation shows that the experts were right — biofuels production does not lead to increased food costs."

In related news, today US National Farmers Union president, Tom Buis, called on the US Congress to again hold hearings to re-examine the cause of high food prices.

Congress previously held hearings this spring with many concluding high food prices were the result of high commodity prices.

Since that time, however, commodity prices have fallen while retail food prices remain high.

Mr Buis said previous testimony had unanimously blamed the rising cost of agricultural commodities and renewable fuels for increased retail food prices.

"This portrayal of retail food prices is finally being proven inaccurate by recent market conditions," Mr Buis said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I have been banging on about this for over a year, IF only a real JOURNO would look at the facts and relay them to the general public. Fact 1. last year's high grain prices were caused by rolling droughts across global production areas. Fact 2 as a producer of grain i have always been told that price of wheat has very little to do with price of bread, 2005 wheat was 145 a tonne what was the price of bread? The price of bread never comes down, like the price of wheat. How can massive food retailers continue to make 10% compounding returns every year, it comes from the consumer or the producer. As a grain grower we need ethanol to use up grain so that we don't return to $80 feed 1 barley on $1100 fert. just look at how global production has responded to high grain prices...one more year of this and the world will be awash with grain. But will the retail price of meat, bread, beer come down?NO, anyway more corn and sugar is turned into softdrink than ethanol. IN this country we should stop exporting 80% of the grain we grow and turn it into renewable fuel for ourselves, reinvigourating regional Australia, how ever the experts would say that this is no good as well...but that's another story.
Posted by micko on 14/11/2008 7:23:24 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Q: Will farmers be better off if agriculture is included in a carbon emissions trading system?

Yes - selling carbon will make us more profitable
(23%)

No - carbon taxes will increase our costs
(46%)

Undecided - We need more information
(31%)

Total Votes: 574
Poll Date: 9/11/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...