News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Bond for going bush unfair, say doctors 

Bond for going bush unfair, say doctors

27 Jun, 2009 08:29 AM
A FEDERAL Government scheme which forces medical students to repay up to $110,000 in fees if they do not work in a rural or remote area once qualified is exploitative and will not solve the dire rural workforce shortage, doctors' groups say.

Since 2004, 600 students a year have gained entry to university by signing a deed of agreement to work in an area short on doctors for a period of time equal to the length of their degree. Bonded Medical Placements now make up 25 per cent of all federally supported (non-full-fee-paying) places at Australia's 18 medical schools.

The Australian Medical Students Association opposes the scheme, arguing it exploits the large gap between demand for entry to the prestigious degree and the limited number of university places available.

An association spokesman, Chris Mulligan, said students often did not realise the long-term implications of signing a legally binding agreement, particularly when they might not gain entry to university otherwise. "Kids sign on to these contracts when they are 17 or 18 but the return of service doesn't kick in until they have gained a fellowship in 10 or 15 years' time, which is around the same time when many are planning to start a family," he said.

There are 2416 students on bonded medical places in Australia, including 729 at universities in NSW. The students must finish their degrees within 10 years, gain a fellowship with a specialist college within 16 years and work for four to six years in a district of workforce shortage after attaining a fellowship.

Overall the student is locked in for between 11 and 20 years, depending on their choice of speciality. If they default on their obligations, they owe the Government about $18,000 for every year studied, on top of HECS payments.

The chief executive of the Rural Doctors Association of Australia, Steve Sant, said the bonded placements were "a necessary evil" in the face of chronic workforce shortages. However, it was too early to say if the scheme had been successful in building a permanent and skilled workforce in the bush.

Fewer than 5 per cent of medical graduates have taken up rural practice in the past 15 years.

Another 884 students are on more restrictive medical rural bonded scholarships, which require six consecutive years working in a rural area after attaining a fellowship. There is an added penalty of no Medicare provider number for up to 12 years on default.

A female GP registrar, who did not wish to be named, said she grew up in a poor family in rural NSW. At 18 she accepted the scholarship, worth $22,000 a year, to help pay relocation and living expenses at university.

But she said signing up was a "huge mistake" because it "imposes unnecessary sacrifices on a future family you don't know you'll have".

In the May budget, the Government announced students could reduce their return of service by working in more remote areas and could count up to half the time spent in specialist training towards their quota.

The Herald spoke to a number of students who said they planned to buy their way out of the rural placement once they were earning lucrative consultants' wages. But Mr Mulligan said the bonds were prohibitively expensive to break for all but the most well-off.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Bloody hell ... well, if they can't get into medical school on their own talents, and with their own money, I fail see to how gaining a medical degree and paying no fees construes exploitation. As for 'not knowing the implications of a contract' at 17 or 18 - what a load of rubbish. If you are too immature to understand that a legally binding contract has consequences, then you're too young for the rest of life. Go back to your parents and hide in the closet! For those who are very clear on what they want, this scheme works quite well. But perhaps it should only apply to those who are clear.
Posted by TM, 28/06/2009 8:50:55 AM
If these students didn't get legal advice before signing they probably shouldn't be doctors. It sounds to me like a greedy people who wanted a cheap education and now don't want to pay the cost of it. The need for doctors in the bush could also be helped by allowing doctors after they do one year in a major hospital to work in tandem with a GP in the bush to learn their trade. The requirement of several years working in what amounts to urban areas means that they no longer see the country as an attractive place to be. These whinging people who now don't want to practice in the rural areas should actually be struck off as they sound to me like they haven't got the guts to be a rural GP anyway. They have effectively gained a professional degree under false pretences if they do not want to fufill their side of the bargain.
Posted by Helen Clark, 29/06/2009 8:52:12 AM
What a disgrace this attitude brings to a once divinely profession!! No wonder why the diseases multiply and the demand for the medicine pre-/or subscribers keep growing! I think it is time people at bush learn how to eat healthy and live healthy rather than depend on these money making robots!!!!
Posted by downtoearth, 29/06/2009 11:27:20 AM
So - Chris Mulligan - what's the problem with starting a family while living in the country - is it too risky because of the lack of obstetricians, paediatricians, gynaecologists, MRI units and so forth, or is it just too far from the BMW/Porsche dealership and the yacht club ??? Mr Mulligan should perhaps take a trip well west of the Sydney Basin, where he will find real people and the occasional BMW dealer (but probably not a Porsche dealer), and a huge need for medical specialists.
Posted by AJ, 29/06/2009 11:54:44 AM
TM and Helen Clark, I grew up in a rural Queensland town, and enjoyed all that a country upbringing has to offer. However, with these benefits also came great disadvantage. High schools in many small towns do not have the resources available to provide the opportunities necessary for all students to achieve their dreams. As a result, the proportion of medical students with a rural background is limited. This is where these schemes are useful. Students struggle for years to gain acceptance into Medical School, and by no means due to inferior 'talent'. They just have not had access to the preparation courses, private tutors and other tools many students in metropolitan areas have at their disposal to assist their acceptance into university. However, your comments come from an incredibly misinformed direction.

TM: students on these schemes pay the same fees as any other Australian medical student. The only benefit this scheme offers is the student can be considered for acceptance with a lower OP score. Also, 18 is a very young age to decide where you will be in your life 15 years down the track - I'm sure your own life goals changed from your teenage years to mid-adulthood. The implications of this contract are not applicable to an 18 year old - especially the numerous subclauses of the contract. For example, only 12 months (potentially unpaid) maternity leave is allowed for a female doctor per child. Furthermore, it is not that they cannot get in based on their own talents. The rural bonded scholarship is a highly contested award. Only 6-10 are available per year, per university, with over a hundred applicants.

Helen: do your research before wielding slander. This education is NOT cheap - no university education is, and bonded students pay the same fees as everyone else. You think your suggestion of rural exposure is novel and even more - useful. However this suggestion would be ineffective and impossible. Firstly, once a medical student graduates, they spend 6-12 more years in further training to become qualified. Do you suppose we just slip in one more year and delay the much needed doctors from being able to practice longer? A major problem with your suggestion - if students don't wish to practice in the bush, they will not want to do this year. You cannot assume it is the governments right to remove people from their families and force such a waste of a year on the students. If it were made compulsory students would begrudgingly spend the year and then flee the confines that have be forcefully imposed on them. Your scheme would drive would-be rural doctors away from the bush, not bring them back.

No, this scheme has its place. It lets bush kids get into med school - and we have seen how great the Aussie outback can be. Therefore, we are much more likely to CHOOSE to return and give something back to our communities. This scheme forces students back, and if that is necessary, so be it. But the bottom line is, many of us, originally from country towns, would have gone back anyway.

Posted by medstudent, 29/06/2009 1:18:29 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
26 June, 2009
27 June, 2009
25 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Is the Grains Council of Australia worth saving?

Yes
(31%)

No
(50.9%)

Undecided
(18.1%)

Total Votes: 332
Poll Date: 21 June, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...