News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 COP 15: World leaders defend climate science 

COP 15: World leaders defend climate science

08 Dec, 2009 03:58 PM
A POWERFUL defence of the science of climate change is being launched at the Copenhagen conference as the UN and world leaders push back on claims by climate sceptics and call for deeper cuts in greenhouse gases from wealthy nations.

The chief UN climate official, Yvo de Boer, strenuously defended the scientific reports of the UN's peak scientific body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, saying four successive reports, peer-reviewed by 2500 scientists, had endorsed the finding global warming was almost certainly a result of human activities.

''I do not believe there is any process anywhere out there that is that systematic, that thorough and that transparent,'' he told reporters as the largest climate conference in history began its search for agreement to secure a global treaty that will meet the threat of global warming.

Concerns are being raised in Copenhagen over the impact of climate emails affair which began when sceptics used hacked emails from the University of East Anglia to attempt to discredit climate change science.

In a signal of a push-back from the UN, the head of the panel, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, was given a prominent place in the opening ceremony of the Copenhagen conference to defend the science and will host a special discussion on the email affair this week at the conference.

Mr de Boer and Dr Pachauri also promised the investigation into the sceptic claims would be thorough. ''This process has to be based on solid science and if the quality and integrity of the science is being called into question then that needs to be examined,'' said Mr de Boer.

Also addressing the opening ceremony was the Danish Prime Minister, Lars Loekke Rasmussen, and the Mayor of Copenhagen, Ritt Bjerregard.

Despite the scientific controversy, political momentum is growing around the huge climate conference as 34,000 politicians, observers, lobbyists and media descend on the city. Tens of thousands of demonstrators have also begun arriving and the conference venue for the next two weeks, the Bella Centre, is surrounded by security fencing stretching for kilometres.

With security jitters already apparent, there is a strong police presence as 100 world leaders, including the US President, Barack Obama and the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, meet next week to try to reach an agreement on key issues. These include the size of the cuts wealthy nations are prepared to make to their greenhouse emissions by 2020 and the measures the big polluting developing countries such as China and India will make to curb their soaring emissions.

Also in dispute is the amount of money wealthy countries are prepared to pledge to help poorer countries develop clean energy and adapt to climate change.

In an apparent breakthrough on this issue, Japan is reportedly offering a pledge of some $10 billion to this outcome.

Mr Boer warned negotiators a deal had to be struck. ''Time is up. Over the next two weeks governments have to deliver a strong and long-term response to the challenge of climate change.''

The central aim of any agreement will be to keep the world's temperature rising more than 2 degrees to avoid dangerous climate change. According to the scientific advice of the panel this means halving global greenhouse emissions by 2050.

Mr de Boer said this meant wealthy nations needed to cut their 2020 emissions between 25 per cent and 40 per cent from 1990 levels.

''Part of the purpose of Copenhagen is to make sure the industrialised countries do get into that range,'' he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Isn't it strange that these emails that have been hacked, are cause for so much concern. One may think that these eminent scientists, the true believers, are telling porkies.
Posted by jerangle, 8/12/2009 6:48:15 AM
They have no choice but to defend Carbon forced Climate change. Otherwise they have no excuse for all rockingup at Copenhagen at the taxpayers expense. But I love the way they still quantify everything with the word 'almost' - they know it's crap but that one word allows them to avoid 'deliberately' misleading the public.
Posted by Qlander, 8/12/2009 9:37:04 AM
Qlander, is there something in the water up there? Over ninety per cent of the world's climatologists and scientists have agreed that the planet is warming up at an increasing rate, and nitpicking at a few faulty emails isn't going to change that. Neither is a few who have the interests of the coal and oil industries at heart. You can buy off a few scientists but not most of the world's best. As for your suggestion that the world's leaders are after a free lunch at Copenhagen do you really think they are so hard up that they would behave in the manner that you might? I think not! Do a bit of reading and then tell us why the glaciers in China are melting and the ice fields at the poles dissapearing at an alarming rate. Based on the assuption that you can read, of course!
Posted by creeker, 8/12/2009 5:21:37 PM
Why let a little thing like faked data stand in the way of thousands of people enjoying a tax-payer funded jaunt to Copenhagen?
Posted by Wendy, 9/12/2009 6:10:58 AM
It would be helpful if Qlander tried to understand the science, or ANY science. Of course researchers use words like "almost certain" when dealing with scientific theory. The thousands of scientific papers published in the last decade, all reinforcing the theory of man-made global warming, are presented to the public to be questioned, corrected, even demolished. It's how science works. The stolen emails, incidentally, (which show no "faked data" at all) were private correspondence, taken by a thief and passed on to unscrupulous websites, and have no scientific status.
Posted by nico, 9/12/2009 6:41:53 AM
Nico & creeker – the codes from the leaked CRU data have been broken by the computer genius Eric Raymond of the Open Source Movement over at ESR, and he has this to say about the fraudulently manipulated data – “This isn’t just a smoking gun, it’s a siege cannon with the barrel still hot.” And additionally – “This, people, is blatant data-cooking, with no pretense otherwise.” – So instead of commenting directly from the Al Gore manual, how about you get your head around the fact that something is very wrong with the science behind the conjecture of man made global warming.
Posted by Hide the Decline, 9/12/2009 9:00:38 AM
Just the kind of rubbish that sceptics needed so they can keep their heads buried firmly in the sand. Get your heads out of it and start some reading - other than what you want to read about "leaked emails" - which the press just love to push as that kind of rot really sells newspapers! I was a climate change sceptic until 2 years ago and since then have read both sides. It's a pity more of you didn't do the same. You are just too selfish to want to go through some pain now - think about those little grandchildren you have now - they are the ones who will really suffer by our stuffing up the world.
Posted by Maybalene, 9/12/2009 9:18:04 AM
Don't you just love the way Trolls like nico and creeper continually refer to the "science" but never actually get into detail? They cannot explain why there is no warming at all in the tropospheric temperature series where the GW theory says it should be. And only the seriously gullible would accept the current alarmist claims that an absence of significant cooling is proof of warming. What TF? So lets take this nice and slow for the climate cretinostra, shall we? Even if 2009 is the 3rd warmest year on record, which it is not, then the most one could claim is that the past increase in temperatures has not dissipated. After adjusting for volcanic cooling the global temperature would have peaked in 1993 and the upper trend line would be essentially level for the past 17 years. The lower trend line, between which annual fluctuations take place would also be almost level, a barely perceptable rise that is much less than the IPCC's silly moving averages that, conveniently, downplay the most recent, "unhelpful" data. So once more for the slow. For something to be warming there must be additional warmth, not merely a continuation of past temperature.
Posted by Ian Mott, 9/12/2009 9:49:37 AM
34000 people wining and dining on a tax payer funded jaunt. No wonder they are not being fazed by discredited data. The meeting hasn't yet taken place, but the results have already been leaked. The left wing ideals of wealthy countries taxing their people to support the poor countries is not unexpected, but will not happen. Any money won't get past the dictators who are keeping their people poor.
Posted by R, 9/12/2009 10:00:25 AM
which scientists ? who are they ? give us some facts not more bull from politicians
Posted by jaimie, 9/12/2009 10:31:31 AM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Which do you think is the best method for reducing Australia's carbon emissions?

Emissions Trading Scheme
(8.7%)

Carbon Tax
(11.7%)

Laws regulating behaviour
(7.7%)

Direct Govt investment in renewable energy
(42.9%)

Direct Govt payments for emissions reductions
(5.2%)

None of the above
(23.8%)

Total Votes: 762
Poll Date: 06 December, 2009

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...