News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Email hackers paid by climate sceptics: UN 

Email hackers paid by climate sceptics: UN

08 Dec, 2009 05:38 AM
UNITED Nations officials have suggested that computer hackers who pilfered thousands of emails and files from a British university were probably paid to undermine the Copenhagen climate change summit.

And according to a British newspaper investigation, the emails emerged from a server operated from a small red building in the Siberian city of Tomsk.

The Mail on Sunday reported that the server is primarily used by Tomsk State University. In 2002, ''hacker patriots'' believed to be students from the institution, acted against a site that had reported events in Chechnya and angered Russian officials.

UN officials confirmed that the files appeared to have been first uploaded on to a website from a computer in Russia, suggesting that the culprits were not amateur climate change sceptics but paid professionals.

They first appeared on a website run by climate change sceptics on November 17.

On Sunday, Achim Steiner, the director of the United Nations Environment Program, said the theft of emails from East Anglia University's climate research unit, a globally renowned climate research institute and keeper of British temperature data, was reminiscent of the Watergate scandal, which brought down US president Richard Nixon.

But he stressed that it was ''not climategate, it's hackergate''.

''Let's not forget the word 'gate' refers to a place [the Watergate building] where data was stolen by people who were paid to do so. So the media should direct its investigations into that.''

Jean Pascal van Ypersele, a vice-chairman of the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, said publication of the emails had undermined efforts by the panel to convince the 192 nations who were to meet at the Copenhagen summit.

''If you look at that mass of emails a lot of work was done, not only to download the data, but it's a carefully made selection of emails and documents that's not random at all. This is 13 years of data and it's not a job of amateurs.

''It's very common for hackers in Russia to be paid for their services,'' he said.

At the time of the student action against the site reporting on Chechnya, the Russian Secret Service said the students' actions were a legitimate ''expression of their position as citizens, one worthy of respect'', the Mail reported.

The officials' comments imply that Russia, one of the world's largest producers and users of oil and gas, may have sanctioned the hacking in a bid to undermine sweeping new agreements on emissions cuts.

Yvo de Boer, executive secretary of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, agreed the leaked emails ''looked very bad'', but urged the media to scrutinise how the files were obtained.

Computer specialists from Scotland Yard are reported to be helping Norfolk officers track down the hacker responsible for the leaks.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This paper is sounding more and more like the leftwing rag that it is every day. Lets just face facts, the climate doomsdayers have been fabricating evidence and cooking the books and making up all these wild leftwing fantasies about manmade climate change for years and the sheaple have drunk the koolaid. If this was a legal case in a court, it would have been thrown out ages ago. The only people who really believe it are the leftwing green drips who need to have their new green religion verified to maintain the belief system.
Posted by Loc Hey, 8/12/2009 7:17:44 AM
13 years of carefully selected data. Whoever did this, knew what they were doing, and knew what they were after. Whistleblower? It's not the e-mails they simply give an insight into the mentality of these people. It's the clear fraud in the computer model codes. Make no mistake this is huge!
Posted by Qlander, 8/12/2009 8:00:00 AM
Isn't it strange that these emails that have been hacked, are cause for so much concern. One may think that these eminent scientists, the true believers, are telling porkies.
Posted by jerangle, 8/12/2009 8:23:05 AM
People are being conned by prefabricated, bogus front organisations that are funded by big energy companies. Check out exxonsecrets.org. The founders of these organisations have roots connecting by to big corporations. For example the US based Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT) that has invited Stephen Fielding to Copenhagen as part of the sceptic contingent and CFACT is funded by Exxon. Wake up sceptics, do you think big corporations are going to sit back and wait to be told what measures they need to take? They have billions of dollars at stake.
Posted by Mike, 8/12/2009 9:35:46 AM
What's the point of this article? We're not sure, but people might have been hired to do something (in spite of the horrible economy)? It looks like one group targeted and surgically exposed underhanded shoddy work of another? How dare they? This article is embarrassing.
Posted by sqwilliam, 8/12/2009 11:11:58 AM
The article is a pathetic attempt at damage control - 'suggested" ... "believed" ... "appeared" ... "probably"... they don't sound all that certain, and they know damn well they've been caught out. Mike, on one side of the equation we have the mega coporations you refer to, on the other side we have the global wannabe rulers - we are in the middle, doing the work and paying the bills of these cretins.
Posted by bill, 8/12/2009 3:49:34 PM
Is this article a joke? I can't believe this would even be printed! Big corperations are involved in the global warming industry, just look at the shonk wind farm developers all leaving Europe now that they won't subsidise any more, all coming out here for an easy buck. More cover up and rubbish that's expected of the climate change industy. I wonder if there was a vote held what would the results be? People are waking up to this con it would seem.
Posted by mick, 8/12/2009 8:29:48 PM
Those still in denial of climate change or global warming need to get an education beyond high school. The poor quality of a good education in science is the reason why denials exist in the face of hard facts. There are more kids wanting to be hip-hop & rap singers than engineers in the US. Sad but true.
Posted by The Kop, 8/12/2009 10:38:40 PM
Who cares if these e-mails and computer code were downloaded by hackers or whether it was an inside whistleblower job? Either way, whoever did this has done the world a great favour by exposing the deliberate manipulation of data, destruction of source data, cover ups and bully-boy tactics used by scientists to perpetuate the great global warming swindle. If the UN truly cared about the future of the planet, as opposed to merely exerting control to wring money out of us, wouldn't they be overjoyed to find out that perhaps we've all been misled and maybe man isn't heating the world to hell after all? The UN's response to this scandal is very telling and merely confirms that global warming is a huge gravy train with the UN in the driver's seat, latest destination Copenhagen. Of course they don't want the truth to come out.
Posted by Wendy, 9/12/2009 6:05:20 AM
How could the release of this information undermine the Copenhagen conference if the information was above board? "Hacked" information has no integrity anyway. It could be fiction. The fact that it is being taken so seriously makes it look more and more like an honest insider may have released it.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 9/12/2009 6:09:32 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
07 December, 2009
POLL
Q: Which do you think is the best method for reducing Australia's carbon emissions?

Emissions Trading Scheme
(8.7%)

Carbon Tax
(11.7%)

Laws regulating behaviour
(7.7%)

Direct Govt investment in renewable energy
(42.9%)

Direct Govt payments for emissions reductions
(5.2%)

None of the above
(23.8%)

Total Votes: 762
Poll Date: 06 December, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...