News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Fielding destroys luxury car tax for farmers' sake 

Fielding destroys luxury car tax for farmers' sake

4/09/2008 6:33:00 PM
The Senate this morning blew a $555 million hole in the federal budget when it defeated an increase in the luxury car tax.

Senator Steve Fielding voted with the Opposition to defeat the bill at the second reading stage. He made no attempt to amend it.

The bill was defeated by 34 votes to 33.

It followed last night's embarrassment when Liberal Senator Sue Boyce failed to show for the planned vote to kill the tax measure.

The Opposition moved first thing this morning to have the vote recommitted.

The Government wanted to increase the luxury car tax from 25pc to 33pc on vehicles worth more than $57,180.

The defeat of the bill will cost the Government an estimated $555 million in lost revenue over four years.

Tax already collected by car dealers since July 1 will have to be refunded to buyers.

Senator Fielding had wanted to exempt farmers and those in the tourism industry who use cars worth more than the tax threshold of $57,180 as tools of trade.

But it was explained to him by Treasurer Wayne Swan that this was non-constitutional and would be a compliance nightmare.

Farmers and tourist operators could claim their vehicle costs as a tax deduction anyway.

The two men are understood to have had a heated meeting yesterday morning.

Senator Fielding has now sided with the Opposition to defeat three budget bills in the past week and he has the Government worried.

"I just tend to think that maybe the Rudd Government thinks they can get away with slugging farmers and tourism operators," Senator Fielding said of the luxury car tax.

Mr Swan said before today's vote that Senator Fielding's requests had been unreasonable.

"His request simply couldn't be implemented. It would have been a compliance nightmare," he said.

"But it's not too late for the Liberal Party to actually demonstrate some economic responsibility in the Senate today.

"Essentially, what the Liberal Party is doing is supporting a tax cut for owners of luxury cars."

The Australian Greens and independent Nick Xenophon sided with Labor to allow the bill to proceed to its final stage.

Greens leader Bob Brown criticised Senator Fielding for opposing the bill, saying opposition would prevent any further debate on the issue.

"The Government ... simply doesn't know what Senator Fielding's doing, nor does anyone else in the Senate,'' he told ABC Radio.

"I don't even know if Senator Fielding knows what he's doing."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I have no problem with the tax being applied to luxury cars that are purchased for pleasure or a status symbol, however I do have a problem when the tax is applied to cars that are used as tools of trade. The further you get away from the cities and costal strip, the worse the roads become with the only roads that are sealed are the main highways, in these situations a decent four-wheel drive is a must to get around. Most of the modern two-wheel drives cannot handle the dirt roads for any length of time.
Posted by corona on 5/09/2008 7:49:17 AM
Since when were $50k+ vehicles essential for farmers? Truth is there are plenty of powerful 4WD vehicles available for <$40K - it's just that some farmers like to claim "bragging rights" with bloody great big F100s or Landcruisers! And Fielding was sucked in by the argument that such vehicles are "essential tools of trade" - what complete rubbish!!!
Posted by Riparian on 5/09/2008 8:06:32 AM
Isn't it nice to see someone giving a thought to people in the bush! And doesn't that get up a lot of people's noses !!! Good on you Steve Feilding.
Posted by Bushy on 5/09/2008 9:56:07 AM
That intelligence has never been part of a politician's job description is gobsmackingly clear from this episode.
Posted by miasma on 5/09/2008 10:14:24 AM
You obviously don't get out in the country much. There is 4WDs and 4WDs and sadly the more expensive stand the test of time but the cheaper end are for the city folk who want a 4WD and would not stand up to gravel roads etc. Surely there are other areas of more importance than the luxury car tax; water and its poor management is one that springs to mind.
Posted by themule on 5/09/2008 10:45:42 AM
1) Why does Kevin 07 keep saying "Working Families"? What about Single Australians? 2) Working Australians, work and save to better themselves and that includes upgrading their cars. There is already a 25% Luxury Tax, Why does the Federal Government want another 8%? Didn't hear them say anything about it at the last election . . . .
Posted by Working Single Australian on 5/09/2008 1:20:13 PM
Three cheers for Senator Fielding!! 4wd and commercial vehicles should have always been exempt, however this stupid tax should be abolished for all vehicles under $75k and the threshold shoud be indexed with the CPI. Labour only seems to represent new and increased taxes and are a major disappointment.
Posted by cq on 5/09/2008 1:56:06 PM
It must be hard dropping your kids off at Geelong Grammer or Kings in last year's 4wd.
Posted by Joe on 5/09/2008 9:15:54 PM
I'm with Joe 5/09/2008. TAX "TOORAK TRACTORS" MERCILOUSLY
Posted by david on 8/09/2008 8:24:02 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Is there a future for young people in agriculture?

Yes
(63.4%)

No
(30.9%)

Undecided
(5.7%)

Total Votes: 722
Poll Date: 31/08/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...