News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Garnaut: Opposition disagrees on petrol 

Garnaut: Opposition disagrees on petrol

4/07/2008 4:09:00 PM
The Federal Opposition has welcomed the release of the draft report of the Garnaut Climate Change Review, but disagrees on the inclusion of petrol in an emissions trading scheme.

Liberal Leader Brendan Nelson said the Coalition supports an emissions trading scheme (ETS) and "real and practical steps to reduce emissions".

"Under our watch, Australia was one of a very small number of countries to be on track to meet its international emissions targets," Dr Nelson said.

"Professor Garnaut has confirmed how significant the process of an emissions trading scheme will be – for our environment, for our economy and for all Australians.

"If Mr Rudd can botch something as basic as solar panels on roofs, he needs to be very careful to get the details right with such a significant reform – for the sake of Australia's motorists, households, pensioners, businesses, jobs, economy and environment."

When asked today whether further increases in the price of petrol should be offset, Professor Garnaut said: "I don’t see any good reason to do it."

But Dr Nelson says that with petrol now at $1.70 a litre, Australians have already received a significant price signal on petrol.

"The Coalition is determined to protect Australian motorists from an additional tax on petrol," he said.

Dr Nelson said there must also be a "global response which involves the world's major emitters – China, India and the United States in particular" - and not just Australia acting alone.

"Australia must also know precisely the price that will be paid before Mr Rudd formally commits us to the new international agreement on climate change in 2012," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Remember the only reason that Australia can come close to meeting greenhouse targets is that broadscale clearing was stopped. The price for meeting greenhouse targets was paid for by the private landholders. It was not paid for by all Australians equuitably. Also, Australian emissions actually increased since 1990 but under the Kyoto agreements Australia was given a freebie with higher emissions limits than 1990. ie. it was an exception.
Posted by Terry on 7/07/2008 3:00:53 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Dr Brendan Nelson
Dr Brendan Nelson

Q: How do you rate the effectiveness of the current exceptional circumstances drought assistance program?

Excellent
(8.1%)

Good
(17.2%)

Average
(17.7%)

Poor
(24.7%)

Terrible
(32.3%)

Total Votes: 344
Poll Date: 6/07/2008

6/10/2008 | In journalism there is nothing worse than interviewing someone with TB - True Believerism. But the rapidly changing world is turning traditional ideology upside down, leaving TB sufferers supporting a brand and not a belief.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
JB Fairfax Scholarship for Rural Journalism
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...