News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Global hunger calls for ag technology 

Global hunger calls for ag technology

02 Jun, 2009 05:11 PM
ONE billion people - almost 20 per cent of the world's population - are hungry, and it's more than that they miss a meal a day, but that they are chronically malnourished.

At the same time, the greatest growth period in the history of the world is underway, and 3 billion more people will be born in the next 40 years, increasing the world's population to 9 billion people. Most of them will be born in the hungry parts of the world.

Accordingly, the pressure on the world's economic and natural resources for food will become intense, and the private and public sectors must provide the leadership required to develop modern agricultural production systems for farmers in those parts of the world, especially in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia.

That's the view of the United States-based Humboldt Forum for Food & Agriculture, as explained by Dr. Philip Pardey, an agricultural economist at the University of Minnesota and a member of the forum.

It's critical for private/public partnerships to create opportunities for commercial farming in sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia and to provide farmers there with modern technologies to jump-start productivity, he said during an interview with Feedstuffs at his office in St. Paul, Minn.

The consequences of not doing so "are unacceptable", he said.

Pardey was asked to join the Humboldt Forum for his work as co-director of HarvestChoice, a project funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to develop frameworks to make farming more productive and profitable primarily in Africa but also in Southeast Asia. The project is oriented toward grain production, but the Gates Foundation has indicated that phase two should also focus on livestock production, he said.

Pardey noted that he has "a long-running concern" in international agricultural development, having spent 20 years with the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), which has 15 international research centers around the world involved in food policy and production.

At the University of Minnesota's applied economics department, he is a professor of science and technology and director of the International Science & Technology Practice & Policy Institute.

The Humboldt Forum is housed at Humboldt University in Berlin, Germany.

Best skills

HarvestChoice has demonstrated that African farmers are determined and entrepreneurial, Pardey said, noting that a farmer will ride a bicycle for miles to buy a bag of seed that he believes will give him a good crop.

However, farmers lack the expertise and technology to be productive, he said.

"We need to get technology into their hands ... to help them become commercial producers," he said.

The Humboldt Forum, which initially met in Davos, Switzerland, in February and launched in Berlin in April, intends "to pull together the best science" to make this happen, he said.

Pardey acknowledged that there have been other African "work groups" that have tried, but he said he senses that the Humboldt Forum is different as it has brought together diverse interests with like views - people he said can bring together "the best economics, the best research, the best science, the best commercial application" and can target decision-makers in government and industry.

These are interests "who have never gotten around the table before" and "have senior status" that will give them access to decision-makers, he said. "I think they will get attention."

They have to, Pardey said, pointing to the hunger crisis now and the potential for it to worsen over the next 40 years.

It can be done and has been done, Pardey said. He recalled the extent to which CGIAR responded to the great increase in India's population in the 1960s and '70s to turn its primitive agricultural sector into a thriving industry that not only produces abundant and affordable food for Indians but even exports wheat and other agricultural products.

The boon also stimulated the development of a significant economy and, therefore, a significant market, he said, and the same scenario is playing out in China.

This experience is repeatable in Africa and Southeast Asia, he said.

Pardey explained that as food production increases, people spend less of their money on food and invest more in other parts of the economy, creating additional income, including income to buy goods and services from other countries.

"As a country ramps up food production, this does not crowd out food producers in North America or elsewhere from exporting to that country but, instead, opens up a large market for them," he said.

"Everything says getting technology in the hands of farmers jump-starts productivity," the benefits of which spread across a country and across countries, Pardey said.

Best technology

Pardey also acknowledged the corruption and war that are rampant in many African countries, but he said companies and institutions are learning to work with non-governmental organisations to build infrastructures that can succeed and realise long-term growth.

One area of focus for such a partnership is productivity research, Pardey said, and while Africa and the U.S. have nearly the same amount of arable land, research spending in Africa is far less in terms of expenditure and in terms of effectiveness than in the U.S. (Table).

For instance, he said Africa actually has more scientists working in agriculture than the U.S., but few of them have doctorate-level skills, so their efforts are less effective.

Furthermore, scientists lack basic needs - money to keep lights on or refrigerators running or to buy gasoline for trucks to drive into the field to collect data, he said.

In any country, including developed nations, "there are long productivity lags from development (of technology) to commercial use," Pardey said. "It can take decades," and the situation is even more complicated in countries in Africa and Southeast Asia, he said.

"So, if we need to increase food production as much as we do to feed 3 billion more people, and we know we won't have more land on which to do that, then we are going to have to increase productivity and do so substantially," he said.

Best choices

Pardey said increasing productivity will require that the world develop and use technology, which will require a better understanding of and support for technology, including bioscience and life science.

"I'm a technology optimist," he said, "but I also know that every technology carries some risk, no matter how benign. The way we use technology carries risk."

Science should be used to assess the benefits of technology and quantify risks so that "we can manage technology" in a responsible and safe way, he said.

However, there are groups and people who disregard the benefits of technology and see it as all risk, Pardey said.

"If that's to be our threshold, then we wouldn't be using electricity," which is invisible and, if managed wrongly, can kill, he said.

The debate over genetically modified seeds, for instance, that "we're tinkering with nature goes back 50 years and is the same argument that surrounded the adoption of hybrid seeds", he said.

If cereal crop yields had not increased through hybrid vigor, achieving the cereal crop production that was produced in 2000 would have required the world to plough up an area the size of Western Europe, Pardey said. That would have had "a devastating impact" on global biodiversity and natural resources, he noted.

"We need to make real-world choices" that are driven by science rather than emotions, he said.

Some interests oppose technology because of their perception that technology is what's driving population growth and, in doing so, pressuring the Earth's sustainability, Pardey said, but that's not true.

"If we stop improving yields, it's not going to turn off population growth. It's going to do the opposite. Population grows fastest in those areas of the world where people are hungry and poor," he said, and couples produce children so there will be a better chance that some of their kids will survive and be able to take care of them.

If food increases and people can spend less money on food and more on other needs or wants, the quality of their lives improves and their thinking turns away from needing children to survive, he explained.

Genetic selection in seeds has been occurring since the beginning of time, and tens of thousands of genes have been bred into or out of plants, Pardey said.

"By definition, agriculture is man affecting the natural order" to produce better and more food, and "the bucolic view" people have of farming is not in sync with reality, he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Smith forgot to mention that on another side of the scale there is over a billion of population obese and suffering from a full spectrum of diseases brought in by the "technologically advanced" food production industry. The same obese part of the population throws away into rubbish tips by some estimates up to 70% of the food available there (thanks to the supermarket distribution model). So maybe the problem is not that there is not enough food produced in the world but rather there is something wrong with the modern food distribution model? If you give the African farmers the "modern technology" I'm sure we'll see a couple of more Murray-Darling artificial deserts, this time in Africa, in a few years time. Another example of one sided thinking would be the latest government proposal of "helping" the poor countries by providing millions of dollars of aid for food money, which most likely will be stolen by the corrupted officials in those countries and won't make it's way to the proposed destination. Would it be better to buy the ag produce from the Australian farmers and send it to those poor countries instead of sending cash?
Posted by Andrew, 3/06/2009 9:54:56 AM
Some one should tell capt blight and the qld govt. they are actively killing productivity in this state.
Posted by R, 3/06/2009 10:03:59 AM
Along with some so-called advances in technology and its attempts to improve on nature through increased yields there has been a proportional decrease in the nutritional value of food (around 50% since 1940) along with an increase in health problems of the population consuming the fairy floss. All the technology in the world is useless unless it is applied to working with nature rather than spiting it.
Posted by Richard Woolley, 3/06/2009 10:59:31 AM
For the last 6 years the world has consumed more food than it has produced. We are already poisoning our rivers, lakes and some parts of the ocean with fertilizer and pesticides that end up in our streams as farmers all over try to feed the masses. The only viable and workable solution to the problem is to reduce the world's population down to 2 billion people or less. We are increasing at the rate of 60 million new mouths to feed every year. Forget about global warming - it is a hoax designed to hide the real problem of desperate people in the not to distant future squabbling over a cup of rice or flour. Go Lemmings GO !!
Posted by jaimie, 3/06/2009 1:35:13 PM
Richard and jaimie, you are both talking complete rubbish. Modern farming technology as applied by to-days farmers is providing high quality food in abundance at historically very low prices.

The reasons for people going hungry in a world of plenty are political. I suggest you spend a little time on a brief study of the African nations and their politics, as a start to clearing up your obvious confusion.

Posted by farmerfred, 4/06/2009 8:21:26 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
02 June, 2009
01 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you support the recommendation to maintain the national beef levy at $5 per head sold?

Yes
(39.2%)

No
(51.6%)

Undecided
(9.2%)

Total Votes: 697
Poll Date: 31 May, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...