News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Greens publish shopping list for irrigation properties 

Greens publish shopping list for irrigation properties

8/08/2008 12:56:00 PM
Environmental groups have published a shopping list to back their claims that large amounts of privately stored water could be bought to give the critically sick lower lakes of the Murray a life-saving flush.

The Australian Conservation Foundation and the Inland Rivers Network have sent the report to water ministers, pointing out that many large irrigation businesses in the north of the Murray-Darling Basin have water in their dams from summer floods and several of the properties are for sale.

But yesterday the Murray-Darling Basin Commission released its own water audit supporting the position of the Minister for Water, Penny Wong, that only rain can help the lower lakes in the short term because there is not enough spare water held in storage to help them.

Even those with water to sell agree that the amount available is just "a drop in the ocean" compared to what is needed.

Without the installation of major infrastructure it would also be physically impossible to return much of their privately stored water to the river system.

Only 350 gigalitres of water is set to be delivered to the lower lakes in 2008-09.

The commission estimates 1050 to 1250 gigalitres are needed to fill and maintain them in the same period.

Some have estimated that more than 1000 gigalitres are stored in private dams in the basin's north, but the commission puts it at 810 gigalitres.

The commission's acting chief executive, Les Roberts, said, "As little as 20 per cent of any water released in the north of the basin would reach the lower lakes … meaning that four or five times the water needed at the lakes would need to be released from that far upstream."

But the report from green groups says: "This proposal identifies six properties that could be purchased.

"They can provide at least 300 gigalitres in the short term to address the immediate crisis in the lower lakes … and over 400 gigalitres could be recovered each year on average for the Darling and Murray rivers for years to come."

The 28,000 hectare irrigation property Ballandool, on the Culgoa River in Queensland, has been on the market since 2006.

Its storages can hold 100 gigalitres but are less than half full.

Simon Southwell of Ray White Rural said Ballandool was a "$30 million-plus" property where the Government could keep the water licences and on-sell the land as a "magnificent" dryland farming property.

"The Government should have stepped in to buy it," he said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Why doesn't the Aust Conservation Foundation buy the properties on their wish list, seeing as they believe they have the solution?

Then they could let go all the water all the time to prove what they say will work.

They have certainly collected bags of money from govts and donations over the years. This is something positive they could do.

Posted by Umberto on 8/08/2008 8:50:29 PM
The Australian Conservation Foundation certainly does not have any plans to conserve the people. Their past activities have already brought us world wide food shortages and here they are calling for further cuts in food production.
Posted by Ted O'Brien on 10/08/2008 9:01:20 AM
Perhaps we humble people of the Southern NSW, who rely on irrigation water from the Murray for our livelihood but are taken as fools in this scenario of supplying water, can tell the Greens and the Kevin 07 gang that there has been a drought for over 7 years in the MDB area. Therfore there is no water in the infrastructure to meet the demands of an ever increasing population along the entire River Murray. Money is being spent buying "empty buckets of water" at the present just to please the ill informed masses who have no idea what is involved in bringing back a supply of water to service ALL the infrastructure users along the River Murray. Time for the ACF to "get real" and talk with people who really know the real story.
Posted by farmers wife on 11/08/2008 6:54:33 AM
No one wants to mention the fact that the Hume and Dartmouth are at minus 324 GL on there commitments, so do we let Adelaide go without ??
Posted by heathdon on 11/08/2008 7:34:04 AM
How about they put in a pipeline to the Murray for Broken Hill's water supply of 8000mls a yr. They can then reduce the 400,000 mls + a yr of evaporation that is required to store Broken Hills water supply in Menindee.
Posted by John on 11/08/2008 11:46:07 AM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Who is your preferred Leader of the Federal Opposition?

Brendan Nelson
(8%)

Malcolm Turnbull
(22.4%)

Peter Costello
(49.3%)

Julie Bishop
(9.8%)

Other
(10.5%)

Total Votes: 813
Poll Date: 3/08/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...