News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Labor raises stakes for emissions horse trading 

Labor raises stakes for emissions horse trading

21 Oct, 2009 05:43 AM
THE Federal Government has put more pressure on the Opposition by demanding that a vote on the emissions trading scheme be held this year, and the Coalition leadership has warned its MPs and senators to stop behaving like a rabble over the matter.

During a routine party-room meeting yesterday, Malcolm Turnbull said the Coalition was languishing in the polls because of the public squabbling. If it continued, he said, it would jeopardise the party's prospects in the upcoming byelections for Higgins and Bradfield, brought on by the resignations of Peter Costello and Brendan Nelson.

"There is no such thing as a safe seat, particularly at a byelection," Mr Turnbull said.

The Deputy Opposition Leader, Julie Bishop, echoed his call for unity, saying the party was "seen to be a rabble" and that was why it had been trounced in recent polls.

Coalition MPs and senators have fought bitterly over the Opposition's response to Labor's emissions trading scheme. Mr Turnbull put his leadership on the line to secure approval to negotiate a raft of amendments, negotiations that are under way.

The Government said it would only negotiate changes that maintained the revenue neutrality of the scheme as well as its greenhouse reduction targets.

But in Parliament yesterday, the Assistant Climate Change Minister, Greg Combet, added a third criterion: "That the Coalition commit to voting on the timetable that we set on this legislation this year in advance of the Copenhagen conference."

The Government has been urging the Coalition to commit to a vote before the international climate change conference in December, but Mr Turnbull is refusing. He has flagged delaying the vote until next year, which most of his backbench wants.

The Coalition has recommended extra billions of dollars in compensation for heavy polluters, but says its changes would create a self-funding scheme. It submitted its costings to the Government yesterday.

During the party-room meeting, Mr Turnbull told his colleagues to be careful about their public comments so as not to imperil negotiations.

The leading rebel, Wilson Tuckey, complained about comments by the shadow treasurer, Joe Hockey, describing him as the mad uncle of the Liberal Party. But missing from the meeting was the backbencher Dennis Jensen, who has vowed to reject any ETS.

Dr Jensen was speaking at a sceptics conference in Canberra, where he restated his view that humans were not contributing to climate change and called for the dissolution of the International Panel on Climate Change, a body of thousands of scientists.

To the chagrin of the Nationals, Mr Turnbull lauded comments by the National Farmers Federation, which supports the amendments, especially calls for the permanent exclusion of agriculture.

The NFF became embroiled in a nasty fight with the Nationals after calling on the party to drop its blanket opposition to any deal and support the amendments.

The Nationals senator Ron Boswell wrote to the NFF president, David Crombie, saying: "There is obviously a considerable gap between what farmers tell me and what you seem to think they are saying on the ETS."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
This arrogant goose just doesn't get it, does he? A party majority that is seeking to get its leader to stop trying to railroad them on a very important issue is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a rabble.

If Turnbull had an ounce of strategic nous he would be demanding to see the properly documented records of how the IPCC reached it's "consensus" on climate. He would also be demanding to see properly documented records of how the IPCC decided which scientists were qualified to be included in the formation of this consensus and who were excluded.

It is, after all, an UN sponsored body that is holding itself out as a formal representative one. So where is the evidence of due process?

Posted by Ian Mott, 22/10/2009 11:09:07 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Who do you think is the best person to lead the Federal Liberal Party?

Malcolm Turnbull
(46.4%)

Julie Bishop
(5.7%)

Tony Abbott
(10.3%)

Joe Hockey
(23.6%)

Other
(14.1%)

Total Votes: 760
Poll Date: 18 October, 2009
BLOGS
15 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...