News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 National transport shutdown will go ahead July 28 

National transport shutdown will go ahead July 28

22/07/2008 7:45:00 AM
After meetings with government officials and union bosses failed to deliver on the week-end, National Road Transport Forum organiser and livestock carrier, Mick Pattel, has confirmed the planned national transport shutdown will definitely go ahead.

Mr Pattel said that the industry feels gutted by proposed national changes that are to be implemented and that truck owners and drivers believes that the shutdown is the only way to get their issues on the table.

"We have nearly exhausted all avenues to be heard and let me make it very clear to your readers, this truck shutdown is a last ditched effort to make the decision makers of this country stand up and take notice that their proposed changes will cripple our industry," Mr Pattel said.

Mr Pattel, together with other truck industry representatives, met with Queensland Transport Minister, John Mickel, on Saturday.

The Minister listened to the issues, however, could not support any of the demands that the National Road Forum submitted.

Mr Pattel said that although the delegation had a good hearing with the Minister, it was disappointing that nothing was resolved.

"The biggest sticking point was the removal of demerit points from log book breaches and on that point, the talks broke down," Mr Pattel said.

"I believe that the Minister is now acutely aware what needs to happen to avert the shutdown, however, I think he has left his run too late and the shutdown is definitely going ahead."

The delegation also had high-level discussions with Transport Workers Union boss, Hughie Williams and staff.

Mr Pattel is confident that the nation will feel the impact of the shutdown next week, with an estimated 70pc of truck drivers across the country prepared to participate.

"The truck industry will not survive the proposed changes, unless you are one of the multi-national boys," he said.

"We feel that our industry representatives, the majority of which do not know the real trucking industry, have let us down - when you couple this with arrogant bureaucrats’ and deaf politicians, you can understand why we feel no choice but to take this drastic action - it really is our last ditch effort."

* For details of the stoppage visit www.forums.altnews.com.au/nrtf

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Good on ya Mr Pattel, you have my full support. More and more the small to medium businesses are paying the price. As a primary producer we need the trucking industry just as the rest of Australia needs you and primary industry.
Posted by freetogo on 23/07/2008 9:12:47 AM
Good on you Mick Pattel, we are with you all the way, shut them down . Let's get common sense back in the transport system, and get rid of all the crap that some idiot politician has dreamed up.

Stick together and stay home, here here.

Posted by NOEL PORTER on 24/07/2008 9:02:25 PM
we are with you - go for it.
Posted by shane on 27/07/2008 10:11:08 AM
good one mick, with you 100%. Our one shot to get this to work in our favour - let's see if we can all disagree to agree for a change and work together for a positive outcome.
Posted by pommy on 27/07/2008 1:06:50 PM
it won't matter because it is just dumb what they are trying to do.
Posted by michelle mayfield on 27/07/2008 1:11:44 PM
what about the australia post drivers - we have been told our union won't back the strike and aussie post won't back the strike. we have been told not to get involved. where do we stand?
Posted by jockey on 27/07/2008 3:50:29 PM
mick pattel, i am an owner driver who has no choice but to keep my truck on the road over the next two weeks due to my financial position. there are threats from people that if i continue to drive during this time my safety will be an issue. i am happy to sit my truck at home - will you cover my payments? i guess not.

i have been an owner driver for the past 3 years and all of a sudden you blame fuel prices etc - mate things were stuffed long ago before fuel went through the roof. don't dictate to me to pull my truck off the road when you can afford to do so - we are not all in the same boat. the thing is with this industry the majority of the people in it are from the lower demorgraphic of society and are not educated enough to combat problems with verbal interaction and only know how to work things out with violence etc. i believe this will be a problem over the next few weeks and it will turn very ugly with no result in the end.

Posted by ardoo on 27/07/2008 5:46:28 PM
yep Mick Pattel - a HUGE thumbs up!!!
Posted by amy on 28/07/2008 6:22:57 AM
We have had enough!!!!! Why are people who have no idea about the real workings of safe and efficient road freight companies in control of what should and should not occur in our industry. We pay extreme registration costs and fuel prices in order to ensure that everyone in our country has at their hands everything they need when they need it. We do our country a service everyday at an emotional cost to our own lives and our families lives by constantly being apart, so why hurt us and our families more by making it cost us financially more than it should. We all gathered and helped farmers in the drought as we should have so now it's our industry that needs the help, and that's all we want is a chance for us to hold onto our livelihoods. corie and cara
Posted by jenkins tpt on 28/07/2008 7:32:56 PM
yes fuel & the new laws they r implementing r a concern but what about the rate which hasn't really moved? For the past 15 years last week syd 2 melb $1200.00 +fuel levy 4 a b/double. fuel cost $1000.00. when i said i can't do the load for that price they added an extra $150.00 - still said not worth it. 'we will get some one else'.

then today they offered $1900.00 because they couldn't get any one - amazing. where did the extra money come from? these big logistics co need 2 be regulated.

if we were payed the proper rate and the same rate both ways subbys wouldn't have to push for that extra load each week. these big logistics co need to be held responsible for the accident and injury as they are setting the rates paying to the lowest bidder in most cases.

Posted by Gary on 28/07/2008 9:34:09 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Will the abolition of AWB's dual share system result in growers' interests being put second to those of the shareholders?

Yes
(70.4%)

No
(25.1%)

Undecided
(4.6%)

Total Votes: 351
Poll Date: 20/07/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...