News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 NFF irate at budget cuts to rural research 

NFF irate at budget cuts to rural research

06 May, 2009 02:22 PM
The National Farmers' Federation has slammed the Federal Government's decision to slash spending on rural research as part of next week's budget, including in the area of climate change research.

NFF acting president Charles Burke says the NFF's pre-budget submission to the government was "crystal clear" in arguing that "agricultural R&D investment is at critically low levels at present with state and federal governments slashing their contribution over many years".

"NFF specifically called on government to increase funding, so it will astound the farm sector that R&D funding is being carved out," Mr Burke said.

"The Government can expect a deep and negative response.

"If the Government believes so fundamentally in the challenge climate change will present agriculture, as they keep saying, how can it justify cutting research into areas such as climate change, resource management and water - it is counter-intuitive."

Mr Burke singled out Agriculture Minister Tony Burke for the hypocrisy of the government decision, as the Minister has previously spoken out about the need for on-farm productivity improvements and the challenge of food security and climate change.

"How can the so-called razor gang expect farmers to meet this challenge if they slash already wafer thin investment?" he said.

"The Government has an obligation to support the development of tools, techniques and technologies to assist farmers manage challenges such as the vagaries of the climate and the scarcity of agricultural land and water.

"Quite simply research and development underpins the development of these tools.

"If R&D programs are cut without them being replaced elsewhere farmers would be right to feel the Government is leaving the field when the going gets tough."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
When will you wake up? Farmers are unimportant to government. We no longer have enough people to be worth chasing for votes.

The fact we feed the country and have major exports isn't important to them obviously. And, despite the world's growing population, they've forced farmers to leave the industry as the wonderful MIS schemes bought up land.

Trees are obvioulsy far more important source of food than what we produce. One day the Government will wake up but by then we may well see the farming sector run by large companies who will dictate what they want.

After all, family farms are no longer considered viable and are encouraged to leave farming.

Posted by Helen Clark, 7/05/2009 7:54:02 AM
They are cutting this funding because they do not want farmers to find out for themselves about climate change and how farmers can cut back on the carbon trading scheme because they will want to make more money out of us. They want us to believe in their research and not our own because it will conflict as it has already started to. If we do not believe in their political propaganda, then they will simply cut funding more like they are now doing. No business in their right mind then will want to invest in the agricultural sector and before you know it, our farms will become mining sites as well. Unless there is a change of government, providing that it will not take another 10 years to sort out the bungles of the current government, then farmers will not have a chance!
Posted by Lee-anne, 7/05/2009 8:56:40 AM
If anybody ever doubted the level of contempt Labor has for the agricultural Industry and farmers, this announcement should put the matter beyond all doubt.

Clearly the Rudd Governement is happy to leave agriculture to its own devices and to leave it to fall by the wayside.

Exports will suffer as a result of this decision, jobs will be lost and our balance of trade figures will deteriorate through decreased exports.

This shortsighted anti agriculture policy is yet another stupid decision by Labor which will be felt by industry long after Kevin Rudd's single term as PM.

Posted by CQ, 7/05/2009 11:53:45 AM
After nearly a decade of drought exasperated (possibly) by climate change, surely our nation's food supply should be of paramount importance.

In the past five years many of our districts most progressive and innovative farmers have left the industry and the town - somebody, stand up now, lead us, defend us (and our research stations, which employ university educated rural kids) and promote us.

We need stability of pricing for all soft commodities and intelligent bank-client decisions based on years of conduct.

Rudd is acting like the "I know better" leader of the boy scout group - he should delegate to somebody who knows what the hell is happening out here.

Posted by Bluey, 7/05/2009 7:48:09 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Has the swine flu outbreak caused you to reconsider your consumption of pork products?

Yes
(6.9%)

No
(93.1%)

Total Votes: 580
Poll Date: 03 May, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...