News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 No study of Twynam sale community impact 

No study of Twynam sale community impact

28 May, 2009 09:56 PM
FEDERAL Water Minister, Penny Wong, told a parliamentary hearing in Canberra last night that the Government does not consult with communities on the impacts of water purchases like the major Twynam buy-up.

Under heavy questioning at a late night Senate Estimates hearing, Senator Wong said it doesn't put every potential purchase it makes to affected communities and doing so would likely be in breach of the Government's commercial negotiations with willing sellers.

Officers from the Department of Environment confirmed the settlement for the $303 million buyback deal took place on Wednesday in what was described as an "all or nothing" offer by Twynam.

The Government confirmed it bought licences from five valleys with different classifications of entitlement, but largely general and supplementary security.

Officers said the rivers where water was bought were the Barwon-Darling, Gwydir, Lachlan, Murrumbidgee and Macquarie.

Senator Wong told the hearing she concedes there would be ramifications from the government "unashamedly removing water from irrigated agriculture for environmental use".

She said the recent sustainable yield studies in each of the regions mentioned proved that the environmental argument for purchasing the entitlements was "very strong".

When questioned on the impacts of the purchase on the communities where Twynam operates, Senator Wong said the advice she had been given was that in recent years the company had been moving away from extensive irrigation towards more dryland farming.

She said the impacts of drought and climate change had been far more significant on rural communities than any water buybacks.

NSW Nationals Senator, Fiona Nash, said the difference was the Government was permanently removing the capacity for those communities to access water in the future, while a drought only removed that access temporarily.

She said the Government could find ways to look at the permanent ramifications of the waters' removal on communities rather than making a decision without a real understanding of what the flow-on effects would be.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I don't see the purchases of water as a problem becasue we have lost water from the system. I see the problem as a WASTE of money. The water is only available when it rains. As I understand it, it is allocation water and that is only available when it rains and there is water in the dam. So if we are going to work on historical access over the last few as the government has, the water isn't and won't be available. So we need to ask Wong, where is the water we have bought? And by the way Penny dryland agriculture is extensive as well. They were probably going that way because the water allocation YOU have bought wasn't ever available.
Posted by Sam, 1/06/2009 8:07:04 AM
The water from the Lachlan does not flow into the Murray. What was Wong thinking? The only time water flows to the swamp at the end of the Lachlan is in times of very wet conditions. No beneifit to anyone only some carp and a few water bids. A very expensive exercise with no benifit. If I ran my finances like KRudd's crew the Bank would throw me off. Perhaps that is where we are heading?
Posted by Fred, 1/06/2009 9:17:40 AM
Ha Fred you give them way too much credit. You think they actually thought about this! haha. The only one thinking in this case are the Kahlbetzers.
Posted by Sam, 1/06/2009 11:51:16 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Water Minister Senator Penny Wong
Water Minister Senator Penny Wong
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
26 May, 2009
27 May, 2009
26 May, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you believe human activity is the cause of climate change?

Yes
(43.6%)

No
(48%)

Undecided
(8.4%)

Total Votes: 1138
Poll Date: 24 May, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...