News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Obama's first job is to lead trade talks: NFF 

Obama's first job is to lead trade talks: NFF

21 Jan, 2009 06:13 AM
Global trade reform probably isn't occupying much of Barack Obama's thoughts on his inauguration day, but it should be his first priority if he is serious about leading the world out of a recession, the National Farmers' Federation says.

America's 44th President was sworn in early this morning (Australian time) and already the world is demanding action from the charismatic figure who has captured the the public's imagination by becoming the United States' first leader of African American descent.

Mr Obama has in recent days tried to soften public expectations for his presidency, as the global financial crisis continues to deliver bleak news for the world economy.

But NFF president David Crombie believes President Obama should focus on breaking the impasse at the World Trade Organisation talks in order to provide an immediate and long-lasting boost to global trade and to farmers' hip-pockets.

"With world economies in freefall and the international food crisis ever-present, leading the charge in trade reform to open up markets could be a key element to solve many of his biggest Presidential headaches," Mr Crombie said.

"The Doha Round of trade reform has repeatedly broken down due to a lack of political will of key players, including the European Union, the United States and big developing countries such as India."

Mr Crombie said this inaction has opened the way for the EU to this week re-instate export subsidies for its dairy producers.

"It's a retrograde, knee-jerk move that makes a mockery of their G20 rhetoric late last year to fast-track trade liberalisation, and only compounds the garbled economic signals besetting world markets as countries attempt to correct the economic downturn," Mr Crombie said.

"President Obama has a unique opportunity to do what no other US leader has ever done… lead the way on trade reform.

"In doing so, drag delinquent nations back to the World Trade Organisation to wrap up Doha and eliminate trade distorting barriers once-and-for-all.

"Breaking down the artificial barriers of tariffs, subsidies and quotas would be a fillip to economies the world over – including the floundering US economy – giving new impetus to world markets.

"At the same time, it would enable farmers across the world to appropriately respond to, and meet, the global food shortage."

Mr Crombie said the current global trade rules were preventing farmers from producing more food.

Meanwhile, during her last news conference in the post of the Bush Administration's United States Trade Representative, Susan Schwab said "significant progress" had been made in the WTO talks, but "obviously it is a disappointment to me that we have not been able to meet the promise of the Doha Round and were not able to close it".

Ms Schwab said it is her hope that the Obama Administration would invest the time and energy necessary to reach a successful, balanced and ambitious outcome to the round which has been going on since 2001.

Despite the desire to conclude these talks and get a deal done, Ms Schwab cautioned that signing a deal for the sake of signing a deal is not the way to go and no deal is better than a bad deal.

"Shutting our doors would encourage reciprocal protectionist action on the part of other nations and really risk a downward spiral," she said.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Like it or not Mr Crombie, farm subsidies are here to stay in countries where agriculture is a valued industry, unlike Australia where we are thrown on the scrap heap. This trend to protect your farmers and to guarantee supplies of food is a huge issue and will gain momentum world wide as a result of this economic crisis rather the free trade "free to rip off" policy that the NFF and other prescribed Government financed Peak Councils advocate here in Australia. If Australia wants to retain some of its fast disappearing agricultural industries, and retain its farmers it will have to embrace the new mindset; the fact is that the policies of the last 30 years espoused by organisations like NFF are our greatest enemy and the reason why most farm businesses are at record low levels of profitability at 2% or less of capital investment. I think that is the reason that NFF is struggling to maintain membership: they are out of touch with reality, trying to prop up a policy that no one at the grass roots level supports.
Posted by The Serf, 21/01/2009 9:19:14 AM
I'll second the above comments. I think it is fair to say that Australia & New Zealand are two of the worst 'developed' countries to be farming in as far as support from governement & also the public, due to policies that leave farmers ripe for the picking by either our supermarkets or multinational corporations. It is a very sad state of affairs when those that produce your food Mr Crombie, would by & large be better off sitting on thier bums with the capital out at interest. Come the day Australia experiences what it is like to be hungry, the powers that be may realise the importance of food security, until then ...
Posted by THEFARMER#2, 21/01/2009 1:30:44 PM
The Sherf (21/01/09, is in my opinion, dead right. The American big lobby groups think that all should succumb to their way of life & it might be more the matter that they listen to the President's Inauguration Speech & face up to "whether they like it or not but to embrace having to be responsible citizens who play their part on the world stage".
Posted by Atheistno1, 21/01/2009 3:42:15 PM
Well, here we go again. The NFF telling the European Union and the America’s (north & south) what their food security policies should be. For 20 odd and long years the NFF has been selling this same flat earth policy and they still have not got the message which is, "They will NOT remove their farm subsidies for the NFF or the Australian Government for any reason". Got it Mr Crombie? With this failed and euthanased policy in hand, it's past time for the NFF to move onto something important like, and this might sound novel, supporting with policy framework the economic viability of Farmers. Obviously this first step will need for the NFF to pull its head out of the sand and its finger out. A good starting point would be to get rid of some of the red tape that increase the cost of production to farmers like, and again this might sound novel, sacking the likes of MLA and the Commodity Peak Councils. Why not put this novel idea to the vote? But that would require some form of democracy to be at work and, we can’t have that.
Posted by Dr Bob, 22/01/2009 12:27:59 AM
If America withdrew all their farm support the most likely effect would be an increase in production to offset the lower prices which would be a major blow to Australian farmers.
Posted by Get real, 22/01/2009 10:06:31 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
New United States President Barack Obama.
New United States President Barack Obama.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce try a move to the House of Representatives at the next Federal election?

Yes
(51.8%)

No
(42.1%)

Other
(6.1%)

Total Votes: 444
Poll Date: 18 January, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...