News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Rising temperatures already hurting US agriculture 

Rising temperatures already hurting US agriculture

22 Jun, 2009 01:54 PM
The United States' National Oceanographic & Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) has released an assessment of climate change and it key effects for American agriculture.

Jane Lubchenco, NOAA administrator and undersecretary of commerce, said the report confirms that "human-induced climate change is a reality" and that "climate change clearly affects agriculture and is also affected by agriculture".

In a media call hosted by the Center for American Progress, Ms Lubchenco said under scenarios of higher heat-trapping gas emissions, projected climate changes are likely to increasingly challenge US capacity to as efficiently produce food, feed, fuel and livestock products.

Tom Kenworthy, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress, added that the NOAA report shows what a warming world would mean for farmers.

"Some will do better, while many will not. American agriculture faces profound and painful challenges if nothing is done to curb global pollution," Mr Kenworthy said.

For instance, the US is already seeing more extreme weather events, and those trends will continue.

This includes increased heavy rainfalls in the Midwest and East and more severe drought conditions in the West and Southwest.

The report found that heavy rain downpours that led to flooding and agricultural damage have increased over the last 50 years.

The downpours have increased 27 per cent in the Midwest, 18pc in the Southeast and 13pc across the Great Plains states.

According to the report, the average temperature has risen 1.5 degrees F in 50 years, and some areas have seen larger increases.

The result has been more heavy rains in the Midwest and New England areas; also, more winter precipitation is falling as rain, which reduces snow pack. That will reduce water available for farming in the West.

In the report, the expected temperature rise ranges from a low of 2 degrees F if emissions are reduced relatively quickly to a high of 11.5 degrees F if nothing is done.

Tom Karl, director of the National Climatic Data Center, noted that 11.5 degrees F could be optimistic, explaining that "recent emissions seen are higher than the highest scenario".

For grain crops, which are a huge part of the U.S. farm economy, faster growth that comes with warmer temperatures means less time for the seeds to grow and mature, Kenworthy noted.

"Even moderate increases in temperature will decrease yields of corn, wheat, sorghum, bean, rice, cotton and peanut crops," the report predicts.

"Further, as temperatures continue to rise and drought periods increase, crops will be more frequently exposed to temperature thresholds at which pollination and grain-set processes begin to fail and quality of vegetable crops decreases."

Mr Kenworthy pointed out that significant yield reductions due to climate change have already been seen: global wheat, maize and barley production in 2002 would have been 2-3pc higher if not for the long-term yield-limiting effects of global warming trends. The combined 2002 losses in productivity worldwide cost farmers more than $4.8 billion at 2002 prices.

Weeds, diseases and insect pests benefit from warming, and weeds also benefit from a higher carbon dioxide concentration, which increases stress on crop plants and requires more attention to pest and weed control.

Livestock impact

Bill Hohenstein, director of the US Department of Agriculture's Global Change Research Program Office, said this report also offers a detailed look at animal agriculture.

Animals are particularly affected by extreme heat stress, which lowers their productivity. Increased heat, disease and weather extremes are likely to reduce productivity.

"For example, an analysis projected that a warming in the range of 9-11 degrees F (in the higher emissions scenarios) would cause a 10pc decline in livestock yields in cow/calf and dairy operations in Appalachia, the Southeast (including the Mississippi Delta) and the southern Plains regions, while a warming of 2.7 degrees F would cause less than a 1pc decline," the report notes.

Dramatic changes are already underway in western rangelands, where higher levels of carbon are reducing forage quality and promoting the spread of shrubs and invasive annuals such as cheat grass.

Reduced forage quality means more acreage is needed to provide animals with the same nutritional value, resulting in an overall decline in livestock productivity.

"Reductions in forage quality could have pronounced detrimental effects on animal growth, reproduction and survival and could render livestock production unsustainable unless animal diets are supplemented with protein, adding more costs to production," the report says.

"On shortgrass prairie, for example, a carbon dioxide enrichment experiment reduced the protein concentration of autumn forage below critical maintenance levels for livestock in three out of four years and reduced the digestibility of forage by 14pc in midsummer and by 10pc in autumn," it adds.

Because of heat, milk production declines in dairy operations, the number of days it takes for animals to reach their target weight grows longer in meat operations, the conception rate in cattle falls and swine growth rates decline. "As a result, swine, beef and milk production are all projected to decline in a warmer world," the report says.

Projected increases in air temperatures will negatively affect confined animal operations (dairy, beef and swine) located in the Central US, increasing production costs as a result of reductions in performance associated with lower feed intake and increased requirements for energy to maintain healthy livestock.

* Read the full agriculture portion of the report here.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
"We underestimated the risks ... we underestimated the damage associated with temperature increases ... and we underestimated the probabilities of temperature increases." - Sir Nicholas Stern, author of "The Stern Report," April 17, 2008.

"Few seem to realise that the present IPCC models predict almost unanimously that by 2040 the average summer in Europe will be as hot as the summer of 2003 when over 30,000 died from heat. By then we may cool ourselves with air conditioning and learn to live in a climate no worse than that of Baghdad now. But without extensive irrigation the plants will die and both farming and natural ecosystems will be replaced by scrub and desert. What will there be to eat? The same dire changes will affect the rest of the world and I can envisage Americans migrating into Canada and the Chinese into Siberia but there may be little food for any of them." - Dr James Lovelock's lecture to the Royal Society, 29 Oct. '07

Posted by dobermanmacleod, 22/06/2009 5:31:35 PM
Sounds like a good time to export some more coal.
Posted by morecoalplease, 22/06/2009 8:38:01 PM
The frequency with which AGW zealots contradict themselves & one another, speaks volumes to the effect that the whole AGW rhetoric is an evolving palaver of lies that grows dumber & more self contradictory by the hour.
Posted by jock, 22/06/2009 9:34:26 PM
The claims that temperatures are rising can not be substanciated because rural temperature trends over the last 106 years in USA stations have not gone up. The rise in temperatures has been through the urban heat effect. Claims that the fertilizing effect of atmospheric carbon dioxide will be negated by the temperature rise is false as the areas where most crops are grown are where the temperature has not risen. The idea that round-up herbicide won't work on weeds with higher co2 fertilisation is false. The reason they might not have worked is the fertilised weeds would have been larger and needed a higher dose rate, something that a researcher may not have known.

The CONSTRUCTION OF THIS REPORT WAS A JOB-ENSURING REPORT TO A PRESIDENT WHO HAS SIGNALLED HIS INTENTIONS A LONG TIME BEFORE THE REPORT WAS PREPARED.

Some of the research quoted is of limited use as they used criteria such as a temperature rise of 6 degrees which is not being claimed by anyone and a rainfall increse of 50%. Where did those estimates come from especially when the rainfall increase has only been 1.5 inches over the last 100 years. The estimated increase in cyclones can not be bourne out from the last 100 years records either. So the report is worthless, especially when we know that many papers have estimated that the fertilising effect of CO2 is 10-14% so if co2 rises won't that anticipated rise in food production help to feed the 800 million people of the world.

Posted by trevor prowse, 22/06/2009 11:14:23 PM
Shonk Alert! Notice how the data showed WINTER warming but the text blathered on about the impacts of summer extremes? Does anyone seriously believe that a 7F increase in a North Dakota winter is bad news? I almost fell off my chair when they said, for grains, "faster growth that comes with warmer temperatures means less time for the seeds to grow and mature, Kenworthy noted." Come again? Could someone explain to these boofheads that faster growth and an earlier start to the growing season leaves more time for seeds to grow and mature, not less. The ignorance behind this NOAA report is breathtaking. How many North American farmers will be complaining about longer growing seasons? And in any event it remains a beat up because the hottest year on record for Nth America is still 1931. And that is despite the endemic Urban Heat Island distortions in the recent data. Welcome to the Bimbocracy, folks.
Posted by Ian Mott, 23/06/2009 10:05:37 AM
Please stop with the urban heat island rubbish. The influence is stripped out of the data, it was the researchers that identified the heat island effect and worked to eliminate it.

The growth of the plant is influenced by more than the temperature and length of season, it is also affected by the available moisture which under a warmer and longer season would be in deficit sooner, the plant may be phototrophic which means its growing season is regulated by available light, soil temperatures play a role as do available nutrients.

The only ignorance I see is how ignorant the anti AGW crowd is to their own ignorance. Jesus Christ himself could come down here and say global warming is real and you are the cause and you would still want to stick your fingers in the nail holes. Numerous reports have shown that the increase in growth associated with the increase in CO2 fertilisation is offset by a reduction in yield and quality. These reports and studies do not look at gloabal warming but at the effects of CO2 on plant growth.

I am tipping these guys know more about grains and research than any of the anti AGW people on this blog. But keep it coming you are doing more for the pro AGW crowd than anyone else can.

Posted by the lorax, 23/06/2009 11:42:53 AM
May I suggest you read the Bible Mr. dobermanmacleod, because like Nicolas Stern, the old biblical prophets of doom raved on about "pestilence & famines in diverse places". They of course had enough nouse to acknowledge the seven year climate cycle of drought & famine followed by seven years of plenty. Hence the reason they advised their royal masters to build lots of grain stores. It is all in the bible & we are currently in the early days of cycle which begins with cold wet weather gradually abating over 3-4years then warming towards hot & dry drought conditions until the end of the 7 year cycle. Though much the AGW zealots might like to, they cannot make a liar of nature nor can they tell the dear old sod what she can or cannot do. For that we owe her a debt of gratitude & I will continue to be her husband-man as I have been for the last 65 years.
Posted by jock, 23/06/2009 2:31:20 PM
Lorax mentions Jesus Christ. The Cardinal Archbishop of Sydney George Pell indicates that the Alarmists are completely on the wrong track. He mentions that the wheels are falling off the Alarmist's bandwagon.
Posted by Len, 23/06/2009 3:49:52 PM
Lorax, it was Steve McIntyre who identified the Urban Heat Island problem and it was climate shrill Hansen and his mates at NASA/NOAA that had to be dragged kicking to supply their source data. The issue has not been resolved, spare us the big lie. You claim, "it is also affected by the available moisture which under a warmer and longer season would be in deficit sooner", but that is pure assumption. It is equally likely that a warmer season will enjoy increased rainfall, especially in temperate climates and produce increased yields. Your ideological baggage is showing but nice try on the smoke screen. Now do tell us how many North Dakota farmers are complaining about warmer winter temperatures.
Posted by Ian Mott, 24/06/2009 9:47:31 AM
Pulp fiction?
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 25/06/2009 1:16:04 AM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Temperatures are rising faster in the winter than in any other season, especially in many key agricultural regions. This allows many insect pests and crop diseases to expand and thrive, creating increasing challenges for agriculture. As indicated by the map, the Midwest and northern Great Plains have experienced increases of more than 7°F in average winter temperatures over the past 30 years.
Temperatures are rising faster in the winter than in any other season, especially in many key agricultural regions. This allows many insect pests and crop diseases to expand and thrive, creating increasing challenges for agriculture. As indicated by the map, the Midwest and northern Great Plains have experienced increases of more than 7°F in average winter temperatures over the past 30 years.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
22 June, 2009
21 June, 2009
19 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Is the Grains Council of Australia worth saving?

Yes
(31%)

No
(50.9%)

Undecided
(18.1%)

Total Votes: 332
Poll Date: 21 June, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...