News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Stern backs down from "go veg for climate" stance 

Stern backs down from "go veg for climate" stance

30 Oct, 2009 01:22 PM
Lord Nicholas Stern has clarified his reported comments on the merits of a vegetarian diet, saying that he was not advocating vegetarianism but instead suggesting that consumers be aware of the greenhouse footprint of their dietary choices.

"I was not demanding that people become vegetarians, but instead suggested that they should be aware that the more meat that they eat, the higher the emissions of greenhouse gases that are implied by their diets," Lord Stern wrote in a letter to The Times of London.

"It is in this sense of lower emissions (and lower water use) that less meat is ‘better’ for the planet."

The Times earlier quoted the author of the influential 2006 Stern Review on the economics of climate change as saying that "meat is a wasteful use of water and creates a lot of greenhouse gases", and "a vegetarian diet is better".

The report brought angry reactions from livestock farming groups in the United Kingdom and abroad, all of whom are feeling the heat from multi-pronged attacks on the environmental and ethical integrity of livestock farming.

In his letter, Lord Stern said it would be "extremely counter-productive" to dictate consumer choice.

However, he urged that food prices should reflect "the real costs of future climate change impacts from emitting greenhouse gases during production”.

"Thus people should have low-carbon alternatives among the products and services on offer to them, whether it is electricity, heating, transport or food, and they should be provided with the information that allows them to make informed decisions about all aspects of their consumption, not just what they eat."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
When I went veg my reputation did not precede me, it followed closely behind.
Posted by Mr Methane, 30/10/2009 9:24:43 PM
Sounds to me he was hassled by flesh eating neanderthals! TRUTH is the vegetarian diet is far better for the world; environment, absolutely for animals and certainly for the rescue of HUMANITY.
Posted by decency, 30/10/2009 9:44:10 PM
We are totally locked into inefficiency and environmental abuse due to culture, history and conditioning. No government will encourage people to go vegetarian because of economic implications. The health professionals won't either because it would threaten many jobs. Generations of conditioning means meat is a "must" and even nutritionists just go with the flow. Vegetarians should be practising vegans. Objectively, a plant based diet is best for the environment, animals and the consumers.
Posted by Vivienne, 30/10/2009 10:21:57 PM
Typical of scare mongers. Do as I say not as I do. No intestinal fortitude or intregity. His word is not worth the breath he has taken to give utterance. Where are the men who say what they mean and mean what they say today?
Posted by Richie 10, 31/10/2009 12:32:11 AM
Maybe our lord nic can tell us what to do about millions of hectares of grass that will release thousands of tonnes of carbon to the atmosphere because it is not being graized and retuned to the soil like nature intended, not just left to rot/die like our national parks.
Posted by a beef producer, 31/10/2009 8:00:38 AM
Good to see the animal rights groups still monitor the Rural Press and use it as an opportunity to spread their vegan ways. I never used to care to much until this pressure started to come from rabid vegans and groups like peta. This is akin to trying to force a religion upon someone. I thought we had choice? If they were really concerned about health they would be better served attacking the sugar industry as it causes many more problems to humans!
Posted by mick, 31/10/2009 12:31:24 PM
To all of you hypocritical vegans, have you ever thougt about what your mother or father fed you when you were infants? And if your deadset interest is to reduce your carbon footprint, you should get out of your house, car and throw away all your clothes and start digging your vege garden, because you're gonna need it.
Posted by Joe, 31/10/2009 1:15:54 PM
So, is Stern now urging that the price of beef & lamb should be driven to a height that compels people to become vegetarians? That certainly appears to be what he is advocating & it is most unlikey that his fellow bureaucrats & greenies will disagree. It has always been my understanding that bureaucrats, greenies & MPs fully support "the pursuit of peace through the prosperity of economic cooperation". So why is Stern now leading them on a war-like mission to pit vegetarians against beef eaters by blaming the latter for so-called global warming despite the fact that climatic conditions have been cooling for the last eleven years? Has the pursuit of world peace been abandoned now in the name of raising taxes to sustain world bureaucracies in the luxury to which they've become accustomed. As I recall the electioneering of the world's political left, they daily accused George W Bush & John Howard of "fostering social dividedness". In this age where the informative newsletters of democratically elected MPs are now subject to bureaucratic censorship, have the words hypocrisy & hypocrites been outlawed?
Posted by jock, 31/10/2009 2:26:57 PM
Why do these academics always do a backflip on what they say? It seems livestock farming groups would have had a big influence on him changing his tune. Where is the person who has the courage of their convictions and call a spade a spade, that livestock production has damaged the environment and now we must make the shift towards a vegetarian world ?
Posted by Kathleen, 31/10/2009 7:03:52 PM
Another dribbling idiot! What would this Lord of the veg have us do with all the land that can't be cropped because the rainfall is too low, but is perfectly capable of raising livestock? Perhaps the Lord of the veg can explain to us how the methane from rotting vegetation is less detrimental to the environment than that of enteric fermentation.
Posted by Brindi, 31/10/2009 8:39:40 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Sir Nicholas Stern
Sir Nicholas Stern
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
29 October, 2009
30 October, 2009
POLL
Q: For what level of cattle transaction levy will you be voting at this year's Meat and Livestock Australia annual general meeting?

$3.50
(64.9%)

$5
(35.1%)

Total Votes: 276
Poll Date: 25 October, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...