News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 Symbolic pledge on climate cuts 

Symbolic pledge on climate cuts

10 Jul, 2009 12:12 PM
AN HISTORIC agreement by eight industrialised powers that global warming should be limited to 2 degrees has been undermined by their inability to convince developing nations to support the aspirational target.

The G8 on Tuesday agreed they should cut their greenhouse gas emissions by 80 per cent by 2050 as part of a global cut of 50 per cent.

It is the first time the US has joined other rich nations in recognising scientific warnings that temperatures must be kept within 2 degrees of pre-industrial levels to give the world a chance to avoid catastrophic climate change.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd cautiously welcomed the non-binding agreement, but warned real results hinged on breaking the deadlock in negotiations with developing nations including China and India.

Speaking ahead of the climate-focused meeting of the 17 members of the Major Economies Forum overnight, Mr Rudd said an agreement including the developed and developing world would not be possible at the talks in L'Aquila, Italy.

"There are 150 days to Copenhagen (climate summit in December) and we have got to give our negotiators fresh impetus, a fresh mandate, a fresh commissioning from their political leaders to try and forge an agreement because this will shape so much of the world's future," Mr Rudd said.

The G8 declaration was hailed as a symbolic victory, but included wriggle room: no clear baseline year against which emissions cut would be measured was nominated.

It has ramifications for Australia, which has a 2050 target of only a 60 per cent cut below 2000 levels. The Government has promised to boost this to 80 per cent after the next election if an ambitious climate treaty is signed in Copenhagen.

Climate groups welcomed the agreement, but said it fell short of the firm commitments needed. "We need urgent action on a strong 2020 emissions reduction target if we are going to achieve … 2 degrees," WWF Australia's Paul Toni said.

The G8 agreement was overshadowed by major developing nations rejecting even an aspirational goal for 2050. They wanted to see rich nations commit to emissions reductions of 40 per cent by 2020 before agreeing to a long-term goal.

Australia's proposed target range is 5-25 per cent.

A final draft declaration for the Major Economies Forum, representing countries that produce more than three-quarters of global emissions, removed an earlier mention of specific targets. Instead, it said only that a global goal should be identified in the next five months.

Yesterday the Federal Government also released a new report showing that climate change is happening faster than expected. The summary of recent scientific research found changes in ocean temperatures, sea levels and Arctic sea ice were all at or beyond worst-case forecasts.

As a result, Australia faces a greater risk of recurring severe droughts and more heatwaves, floods and bushfires.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Symbolic gesture is dead right. What are they going to do? Order the sun to behave?
Posted by Arden, 10/07/2009 9:14:08 AM
Apparently the target was..."undermined by...inability to convince developing nations to support the aspirational target". Good. Clever developing nations. I love these hysterical articles that point to climate change happening faster than expected...yet the rate of sea level increase is declining (verifiable fact), Arctic sea is is greater this year than the last several years, and is at average levels (within a standard deviation of the long-run mean). And ocean temps are now the scare because global air and land temps have been flat or declining for years.

It's a mixture of omissions and obfuscations, all in the name doing something that will have no effect but sill provide tools to tax and manage businesses, farms and our lives.

Luckily, the world is choosing not to fulfil these fantasies (as I said - declining temps, recovering sea ice, record cold days etc etc)

Posted by DMS, 10/07/2009 9:22:51 AM
If they stand at the ocean and command the waves to stop, would that work as well?
Posted by Sam, 10/07/2009 9:24:10 AM
What a crock! The Arctic was once tropical and can be again.There have been eight major ice ages in the last million years, was the last one the end of it? Climate change is not about the weather next week or next year. It is about time that politicians and so-called climate experts learned the difference between the two.

The real problems will arise when all coastal cities are flooded - Holland and Bangladesh disappear and hundreds of millions fight for a toe-hold on the remaining land. The only viable solution to it all is to reduce the population back to 2 billion or less.

But we won't do it, we will continue to breed like rats until worldwide famine kills several billion people. Go, Lemmings go!

Posted by jaimie, 11/07/2009 2:37:08 AM
And I thought Howard was a nut case, this country is in deep trouble with this bloke at the helm. Denise the menice all grown up! Get ready for a true banana republic under Krudd.
Posted by Loc Hey, 12/07/2009 5:07:20 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
POLL
Q: Many federal politicians are overseas on trade missions and study tours, during Parliament's winter recess. Is the cost to taxpayers justified?

Yes, the trips are worthwhile.
(26.7%)

No, they're not justified.
(73.3%)

Total Votes: 435
Poll Date: 06 July, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC SJ



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...