News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 US farmers join fight against effects of carbon trading 

US farmers join fight against effects of carbon trading

09 Jun, 2009 09:38 AM
Like their Australian counterparts, United States farmers are worried a proposed carbon cap and trade system to counter climate change will devastate agricultural industries.

US House Agriculture Committee Ranking Member Frank Lucas, says the cap and trade bill currently under consideration will have a devastating economic impact on production agriculture and rural economies.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has set a June 19 deadline for movement on the bill, which won't give other committees such as Agriculture much time to review and amend the bill.

But Mr Lucas stressed it was important for Congress to allow the legislative process to work by holding hearings and having a markup.

Although agriculture will be significantly impacted by this legislation, Mr Lucas said the bill largely ignores farmers and ranchers, and fails to specifically recognise the role agriculture can play in providing carbon offsets.

Worldwatch Institute has co-published a report that shows agricultural practices are the only innovations available today to sequester greenhouse gases that are already in the atmosphere by pulling in carbon dioxide through photosynthesis to grow and sustain more plants.

The report says mobilising agricultural carbon sequestration is an essential tool in the effort to reduce the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases to the 350 parts-per-million level that many scientists argue we must achieve to stem climate change.

The 25x'25 Alliance has issued a list of proposed amendments to the legislation that the organisation said are needed to maximise the benefits that agriculture and forestry can provide in the cap-and-trade program outlined in the measure.

At the US National Press Club on Friday morning, 25x'25 Carbon Work Group chairman Nathan Rudgers said the program must have domestic offsets with identical characteristics and risks, and sequestration offsets must be for a contracted duration, with a suggested "permanence" of 50 years.

Rudgers also said USDA should be the lead agency to assume responsibility for the majority of farm and forestry offset functions.

The 25x'25 Alliance says it is critical that the current legislation be amended to provide the kind of necessary detail that will insure the viability of the cap and trade system's offset components and provide a program that can deliver significant near-term biological sequestration and greenhouse gas reduction services.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The understanding of sequestering carbon in soil and plants is the critical factor in farmers being able to strike a deal on carbon trading. Soil and plant carbon sequenced through healthy functioning soils can be sustained and at the same time help with food security. Some farmers will have to improve their farming practices to maximise there carbon sequencing and reduce their imputs, but once they understand the carbon cycle many of the existing inputs will not be necessary.

The science behind this is not clearly defined yet, but once we can measure farming management to carbon cycling we will be able to assess the carbon credits or losses. The whole debate is important, it is creating awareness of how our natural system works and will in the end build natural capital which has been declining everywhere especially in our water quality/quanity and soil health.

Posted by concerned, 10/06/2009 8:48:56 AM
For a layman's point of view the carbon credits are nothing more than a revenue raiser. No amount of money raised in a carbon tax will stop or reduce the effect of climate change? Every house in Australia has at least two vent pipes emitting methane from the household sewage system. The rotting vegetation in forests emit methane gas. Sewage farms with settling ponds emit methane gas. Vegetarians emit methane gas. The sea emits methane gas. When is somebody in the agricultural industry going to stand up and call this hoax on the Australian public for what it is? The meat producers have not had a price rise for their product for over ten years, yet every major catastrophe has caused a price rise at the point of sale. Major supermarkets are more concerned with shareholder value than the general public, we can see this and we (the general public) are sick to death of it. Don't think that the general public are blind to the fact that every sales outlet for products will take advantage of the carbon credits and pass on huge price rises to the public while passing the actual cost back to the producer. The whole climate change debate is nothing more than a vehicle for greed, corruption and promoting people's private agendas.
Posted by snow, 10/06/2009 10:21:56 AM
Most important is to ensure a level international competitive playing field. Therefore, exports need to receive a rebate for the carbon tax paid and imports need to be charged a carbon duty (as local producers have paid). These are key points which farmers organisations are ignoring to their members' future detriment.
Posted by terry, 10/06/2009 1:19:07 PM
Snow, I believe you have hit the nail on the head.
Posted by pat, 10/06/2009 9:35:41 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
08 June, 2009
04 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Should the Senate reject the federal Government's proposed Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS) legislation?

Yes, reject it: the Senate should vote against the legislation passed last week by the House of Representatives.
(62.7%)

No, vote for it: the legislation should be passed by the Senate.
(11.6%)

Postpone it: Senate should wait till after Copenhagen Summit.
(25.7%)

Total Votes: 723
Poll Date: 08 June, 2009

Most popular articles

ELDERS NEWS MREC FW



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...