News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 General 
 US moves to end ethanol tariffs 

US moves to end ethanol tariffs

16 Jul, 2009 06:30 AM
Legislation that would gradually phase out United States government support for corn-based ethanol over five years and encourage the commercial development of second generation biofuels has been introduced in the House of Representatives.

The bipartisan bill, H.R. 3187, 'The Affordable Food and Fuels for America Act', was introduced by Republicans Joseph Crowley Mary Bono Mack.

The Balanced Food and Fuel Coalition (BF&F), applauded the introduction and said the legislation "is absolutely critical to both producers and consumers of food by controlling volatile commodity markets and ensuring all users of feed grains compete on a level playing field."

The National Cattlemen's Beef Association said the legislation allows for a market-based approach for competing demands for corn.

NCBA outlined that Since January of 2008, cattle feeders have lost a record $US5.2 billion in equity due to high feed costs and economic factors which have negatively affected beef demand.

According to the United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service, in 2008, feed costs for livestock, poultry and dairy reached a record high of $US45.2 billion – an increase of more than $US7 billion over 2007 costs.

Yet farm gate cattle and calf receipts have essentially remained flat, at between $US49 and $US50.2 billion during the past five years.

"Soaring feed costs and government payments to the ethanol industry are hurting small businesses and family ranches. Cattle producers don’t ask for subsidies, just equal footing," according to a statement from Gary Voogt, NCBA president.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
I would like to thank Farmonline for running this article regarding corn ethanol. It demonstrates the stupidity of our governments continued policies of developing a grain ethanol industry in NSW.

All arguments for grain ethanol have been progressively demolished over the last few years and this bill reflects this.

In Australia we are fortunate that we have not gone far down the track of grain ethanol and can halt now. The E10 mandate in NSW demands the development of a grain ethanol industry, there being little sugar cane in NSW and the timeframe not allowing the development of cellulose ethanol.

IPART suggests..." That the NSW Government commissions an economic appraisal of the Biofuel (Ethanol Content) Act 2007 and Biofuel (Ethanol Content) Amendment Act 2009 by an independent, appropriately qualified party.

The Acts should be repealed unless the independent appraisal shows that they produce a net economic benefit. The Government should publicly report on the economic appraisal and its outcomes." I agree.

Posted by Two Bob, 17/07/2009 9:22:09 AM
Without a mandate, the oil companies will continue to benefit and the development of alternate biofuel industries just won't happen as banks (just for starters) won't finance projects without government support.

Let's not do away with the E10 mandate, just extend the timeframe for further development.

We haven't followed the American tarrif line anyway. It's not all about economics - it's also about cleaner fuel and the air we breath - especially when visiting the city.

Posted by Maybalene, 17/07/2009 10:41:19 AM
Maybalene, I agree with you that we must develop alternate biofuels but the conversion of grain to biofuels just do not shape up as a feasible alternate biofuel. Biofuels must be defined by feedstock.

Ethanol ain't ethanols, as I think the slogan goes.

Money wasted on subsidising the development of a grain biofuel industry can be directed to the preferred sugarcane ethanol and the range of second generation biofuels showing potential.

How about we extend the timeframe of the E10 mandate, but exclude grain biofuels.? We can import Brazilian sugarcane ethanol if we need to set up a distribution infrastructure, cheaper and more environmentally sound.

Posted by Two Bob, 17/07/2009 3:23:53 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Is Malcolm Turnbull the best person to lead the Federal Opposition?

Yes
(53.3%)

No
(35.3%)

Undecided
(11.5%)

Total Votes: 584
Poll Date: 12 July, 2009

Most popular articles




North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...