News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Abbott carbon plan 'unworkable' 

Abbott carbon plan 'unworkable'

16 Mar, 2010 05:58 AM
TONY ABBOTT'S ''direct action'' climate strategy would reduce emissions by only half as much as the Coalition claims because it made over-optimistic assumptions about the amount of carbon that could be stored in soil, a study suggests.

Soil carbon accounted for 60 per cent of the proposed emission reductions in Mr Abbott's climate policy, or about 85 million tonnes of carbon a year by 2020.

But according to the analysis, only 27 million tonnes a year is possible and only 18 million tonnes at the low price the Coalition has budgeted to pay for soil carbon from its multibillion-dollar ''direct action'' emissions reduction fund.

Last month the Coalition said its scheme would match the government's promise to cut emissions by at least 5 per cent by 2020, but would do this by buying abatement directly from farmers and industry - not by putting any price on carbon.

But the analysis, by ClimateWorks - a partnership between the Myer Foundation and Monash University - and McKinsey management consultants, suggests the scheme would either deliver far smaller emission cuts than the Coalition claims or would cost far more than the $3.2 billion budgeted over the first four years.

Even if the Coalition achieved the 27 million tonnes a year ClimateWorks thinks is possible, and all its other planned reductions, the overall impact would be a 6 per cent rise in emissions in 2020 compared with 1990, rather than a 5 per cent cut.

The executive director of ClimateWorks, Anna Skarbek, said her analysis had used ''realistic assumptions'' about how much carbon could be stored through new ways of planting crops or managing pastures and grasslands, and about how much of Australia would be subject to the new methods.

The analysis says Australia could cut its emissions by 25 per cent - five times as much as either main party is promising - at the relatively low cost of about $185 a year a household. It says the cheapest way to make cuts would be through a carbon price and direct government action.

Ms Skarbek briefed advisers to the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, and several ministers yesterday and former opposition leader Malcolm Turnbull. Advisers to Mr Abbott and opposition climate spokesman Greg Hunt were unavailable.

The Greens criticised ClimateWorks for not modelling much tougher cuts than 25 per cent.

Mr Turnbull told ABC's Four Corners last night Mr Abbott's decision to reverse the Coalition's previous support for an emissions trading scheme was ''entirely political''.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Bigears you would be better off coming up with some ideas about how to run the country than this tripe!
Posted by tigerdicky, 16/03/2010 7:34:28 AM
Tony would win the next election if he promised to cut emissions by 50% within 20 years and at the same time reduce energy costs. All we have to do is get over our phobia regarding Nuclear power. Today there are some 436 nuclear power reactors operating in 30 countries plus Taiwan, with a combined capacity of over 370 GWe. In 2008 these provided 2600 billion kWh, about 15% of the world's electricity. refer: http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf17.html
Posted by Siruke, 17/03/2010 5:53:22 AM
There is merit in an ets and pushing hard to making all aspects of our managment efficient from improving our soil carbon sequencing to retro fitting buildings Lets get GOING
Posted by concerned, 17/03/2010 6:07:15 AM
Thank you for recognizing the carbon sequestion of soils Tony. Labour did not want to admit to this until approx 2012 or furthur I believe. Farming and grassland agriculture is a huge plus factor in the carbon credits game - farmers were being set up to be the fall guys again, as an easy mark to tax. Huge Research and development money was available from the government to see how much "gas" is coming from cows - but are not so keen to see how much carbon is retained is our soils and grasses.
Posted by jillaroo, 17/03/2010 6:57:17 AM
The statement from Malcolm Turnbull that Mr Abbott's decision to reverse the Coalition's previous support for an emissions trading scheme was ''entirely political'' is just sour grapes. The only political posturing here is from MT.
Posted by agribiz, 17/03/2010 9:39:58 AM
Reducing carbon emissions and maintaining economic growth and recovery from the global financial crisis are two impossible goals in my book. What do we want - less CO2 or a future for our children and grandchildren? Many of the greenies scaring people that there is no future if we allow CO2 emissions to continue increasing have no children. They have no grandchildren to care about. They are simply keeping themselves in comfort by emotionally scaring and exploiting other people to the detriment of our children's future. At least Tony Abbott has shown he cares about our children's future more than green mantra and climate change doctrine.
Posted by Common Cents, 17/03/2010 10:57:01 AM
I have been staggered for most of my adult life at how well the Conservative side of our Australian politics salivates and gorges itself over the self-serving postulations of disaffected past operatives. It is akin to being addicted to sniffing headline ink as opposed to sniffing fuel. Why? Please decide amongst yourselves [disaffected operatives] if you wish to be scribed in the annals of Australian history as a objective contributor or a subjective taxonomic subkingdom player. Pull your bloody socks up both of you, Costello and Turnbull, and behave with the intellect you advised us and we perceived that you had for both the Party and for all Australians, otherwise you will soon join the little bespectacled nerd who 'temporally' swivels at the Despatch Box on the Governments side in the Lower House as lifetime members of the Gunna Club!
Posted by Clark Goodwin, 17/03/2010 3:01:56 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott.
Federal Opposition Leader Tony Abbott.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
15 March, 2010
12 March, 2010
POLL
Q: Do you support the move to introduce an import risk analysis on beef from BSE-affected countries?

Yes
(74.6%)

No
(22.4%)

Uncommitted
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 389
Poll Date: 15 March, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...