News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Energy target latest green policy to falter 

Energy target latest green policy to falter

26 Feb, 2010 05:49 AM
THE Rudd Government will announce changes to its renewable energy target - another environmental policy failing because of maladministration.

After closing its household insulation program and phasing out its green loans scheme, the government will soon announce major changes to the RET, which was supposed to encourage new large-scale renewable projects but has led to billions of dollars of investment being put on hold.

The RET was supposed to ensure that 20 per cent of Australia's energy was sourced from renewables by 2020 by requiring big energy consumers to buy certificates on a new green energy market.

But the price of the certificates plummeted below the amount required for the financial viability of wind farms and other large-scale projects, partly because the government used the scheme to reward households installing rooftop solar panels after the cost of its $8000 solar rebate program blew out.

The range of federal and state subsidies for rooftop solar and solar hot water heaters also contributed to the market being flooded with cheap certificates from domestic technologies.

New wind-farm investments were put on hold, work was stopped on projects that had already started and wind turbine maker Keppel Prince Engineering warned it would have to sack 150 workers as soon as this week.

With the government determined to avoid another environmental program disaster and more politically damaging job losses, it is now actively considering several options to fix the problem with an announcement said to be ''imminent''.

One is to make the 20 per cent target applicable only to the large-scale plants, with certificates from domestic technologies added on top.

Another option that has considerable support in cabinet is to set up a separate market for certificates from domestic technologies, so the market won't again be blind-sided if state or local governments offer yet more subsidies to households.

AGL is one of the major companies with huge investment projects at risk. It is due to deliver its profit results today.

The Clean Energy Council says that without significant changes there will be no major renewable energy investment in Australia for at least seven years.

Any changes would have to pass the Senate, where the Greens have already proposed amendments and the Coalition has said it is willing to negotiate to fix the scheme.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
How hopeless is this Government? Continually changing the rules will not help investment or the environment. This on top of the dramatic drop in Landcare funding & projects since the last Federal election.
Posted by Maverick, 26/02/2010 8:35:48 AM
In The Australian, 24/2/2010 the headline over the Luke Slatterly report read: “Climate wars give science bad name.” It is scientists that have given science a bad name by dabbling in scary enviro-science fiction to accommodate the revenue raising wish lists of economic rationalists seeking to double/treble the cost of consumption taxed goods & services in the name of global warming. Would it not have been wiser of the rationalists & their political cohorts to speak the truth by declaring: We have to increase consumption tax a 100% in order to fund the salaries & superannuation of those given PhD’s as an alternative to dole money in order to keep the unemployment rate down in a mechanised world.
Posted by jock, 26/02/2010 9:08:21 AM
Okay Maverick - but continuously doing nothing for 11 years, which was Mr Howard's approach to a problem he didn't want to admit was real, didn't help investment or the environment either, did it? At least it's on the ALP's agenda!
Posted by Pickle, 26/02/2010 9:20:30 AM
Oh the poor foreign owned wind companies, down on their knees trying to suck more money out of the australian consumers by way of subsidy. If these projects were actually efficient and worked they would not need all this artificial market mechanisms. Its not like wind farms are new technology, they are been about in europe for years where they are only viable due to the massive subsidy. It would be much better for everyone to have a solar hot water system on their homes that will save consumers money, than paying 3 or 4 times as much for intermittant power that cant even be stored. (unlike hot water)
Posted by mick, 26/02/2010 11:37:28 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
24 February, 2010
25 February, 2010
POLL
Q: Has the Meat Standards Australia system been good for sales of Australian red meat?

Yes
(46.6%)

No
(33.2%)

Undecided
(20.2%)

Total Votes: 410
Poll Date: 21 February, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...