News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 ETS the only option, says Treasury on climate change 

ETS the only option, says Treasury on climate change

02 Feb, 2010 05:41 AM
THE Intergenerational Report has panned Tony Abbott's proposed direct action approach to climate change, saying a market-based mechanism such as the federal government's emissions trading scheme is the only way to go.

The report says that without an overall cap on carbon emissions such as that contained in the government's emissions trading scheme, coal-fired electricity generation, the nation's largest source of carbon pollution, will grow strongly in the decades ahead while the development of alternative energy sources will flatline.

The report, released yesterday by the Treasurer, Wayne Swan, also forecasts that anybody still alive in 90 years will be $17,000 a year worse off in today's dollars if climate change is allowed to go unmitigated.

The report estimates that by 2100, gross domestic product will fall by eight per cent.

Mr Abbott will unveil today the Coalition's latest response to climate change, developed over the summer after Malcolm Turnbull was dumped as leader for supporting an amended ETS he negotiated with the government.

It will rely heavily on trees, soil management, and energy efficiency codes to reduce carbon emissions, all of which the government says would have to be prescribed by regulation or funded out of the budget.

The report says the government's scheme would ''deliver emissions reductions at a lower cost to the economy than prescriptive measures such as regulations or subsidies''.

Market forces would also determine when and how greenhouse gas abatement would occur.

The report says the economy would continue to grow under the ETS, with growth slowed only by 0.1 of a percentage point by 2050.

The report will do nothing to sway the Opposition, which calls the ETS a ''great big new tax'' and will block it again in the Senate after the legislation is reintroduced today.

''We have a very important job as a Coalition over the next fortnight,'' Mr Abbott said yesterday. ''We have to save Australia again from Mr Rudd's great big new tax.''

Mr Abbott's scheme will be funded from the budget, causing the Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, to label it a ''huge megatax''.

Mr Abbott said yesterday that he would fund his scheme from budget savings.

The government's scheme will be self-funding, using revenue from taxing big polluters to compensate households for the increased cost of living and to provide business with transitional assistance.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
So it is the hard-headed "socialist" with realistic market-based solutions based on a clear understanding of human behaviour or the "free-marketeer" offering the "magic pudding" solution, based on government-directed restrictions and controls in every aspect of day-to-day living. I will go with the realist, not the pie-in-the-sky con man. Not really a hard decision, is it? Not unless you are driven by self-interest and ignorance.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 2/02/2010 11:12:28 AM
Would you just run that past me again Bushie, please?
Posted by What the, 2/02/2010 5:44:21 PM
Climate change has been happening since the world began, and if any one thinks anything humans do will affect something as mighty as mother nature, they are living in fairy land. The monetary crash in the world was caused by greedy bankers and money men. The "we must fix global warming by scaring the pants off the unsuspecting public" is just a scam by greedy scientists fixing their jobs with research money for the rest of their working lives, and greedy money men who intend to profit hugely from the panic they intentionally caused.
Posted by Concerned Northerner, 3/02/2010 6:41:36 AM
Seems like you're an expert in self interest & ignorance bb!
Posted by yofussn, 3/02/2010 6:56:01 AM
If I'm still alive in 90 years I will be 156 years young and the loss of 15,000 dollars will worry me, how will I pay the 1000 dollars a week energy bills introduced by Krudd way back when I was a lad. I should be able to go back to pommie land and skate on the Thames again as the winters get colder still. People might be wearing wool again in an effort to keep warm or have I got that the wrong way round? I've had no response from the two wayword senators who are going to tax me out of existance - but I didn't really expect one. Bushie can you put your post in Kruddish so we can all understand it.
Posted by Wollie, 3/02/2010 7:59:17 AM
Oh really swanny!! 90 years!! Since when has any Labor govt ever looked more than 3 years down the track?
Posted by R, 3/02/2010 8:51:29 AM
The Australian political cycle, operates something like this: The coalition government presides over a long period of economic prosperity. A generation of young voters grows up during this period of economic prosperity, knowing nothing but the coalition government. They want change (as young people always do) so they vote in a Labor government. Labour government crashes the economy. Slightly older and a lot wiser people vow never to vote labor again. Coalition government repairs the economy and presides over a long period of economic prosperity. A generation of young voters grows up during this period of economic prosperity, knowing nothing but the coalition government. They want change (as young people always do) so they vote in a Labor government. Labor government crashes the economy. Slightly older and a lot wiser people vow never to vote labor again.
Posted by Qlander, 3/02/2010 9:48:12 AM
It looks like there is a few "Labor lickers" in the treasury.
Posted by Hot air, 3/02/2010 11:54:07 AM
Wayne Goose, how can you forecast 90 years when you couldn't forecast the financial crisis? Just more of the scare mongering that this lot love.
Posted by jerangle, 3/02/2010 12:54:34 PM
Just read it again, slowly and perhaps with your index finger, "What the", and if it is still beyond you, sit down and think for two minutes. That ought to do it.
Posted by Bushie Bill, 3/02/2010 3:35:45 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
01 February, 2010
02 February, 2010
01 February, 2010
02 February, 2010
01 February, 2010
MULTIMEDIA
29 January, 2010
31 January, 2010
POLL
Q: What level of trust do you have in the claims made by environmental campaigners?

Total
(5%)

High
(12.7%)

Moderate
(6.2%)

Low
(21.3%)

None
(54.8%)

Total Votes: 1310
Poll Date: 31 January, 2010

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...