News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Foreign ownership report a whitewash: Cobb 

Foreign ownership report a whitewash: Cobb

19 Jan, 2012 06:06 AM
A NEW report from ABARES which indicates little change in the level of foreign ownership of Australian farm land since the 1980s has been described as a "whitewash" by Shadow Agriculture and Food Security Minister, John Cobb.

He said the report had glossed over the issues needing forensic examination and had failed to shed new light on who owns what in our own "backyard".

"The public expected some hard-nosed investigation but instead all we have is some flimsy rehashed data that we could have got from picking up any newspaper.

"The only thing this confirms is the Labor government hasn't got a clue and its 100 per cent capital city-based Cabinet is plainly out-of-touch with what is happening in regional Australia. This is an attempt to pretend the issue does not exist and that there’s nothing to see here – so move along.

"We need real data about the levels of foreign ownership of farm land and agribusiness so the government can monitor foreign buy-outs and adjust policy settings when foreign control is not in Australia’s national interests.

"This is not ABARES' fault. The government hasn't given this study the scope required to fully assess the situation, instead it is reinforcing the useless information provided by the ABS survey carried out last year.

"The ABS survey didn't even look at the value of production under foreign control or the nationality of foreign landholders, so provides even less information than 1983-84 data almost 30 years ago.

"The ABARES report states on page 1 that the "information is extremely limited"… we didn’t need an expensive government report to tell us that.

"The Coalition remains deeply concerned about this issue and we will announce our policy in coming months.

"It is obvious that the $231 million trigger before the Foreign Investment Review Board (FIRB) weighs in is clearly out of step with reality, and that the disparity between the trigger for urban versus regional purchases is nonsensical."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Good. This debate isn't about should they or shouldn't they, it's about finding out exactly what's going on - on one hand this Federal government bleats on about food security, but in the next breath state "we don't really know how much land is foreign owned, and why, and don't really care".

Those harping about xenophobia and rednecks - why are you against any kind of scrutiny whatsoever in regards to foreign ownership of agricultural land, water and business?

We need foreign investment for sure, but we need also to know the facts.

Posted by Bluey, 19/01/2012 8:12:50 AM
It's in the way it is reported and whose agenda is being followed

http://www.smh.com.au/national/concerns-over-farm-ownership-20120118-1q6nn.html

http://www.smh.com.au/national/mining-push-drives-foreign-farm-ownership-over-10-20120118-1q6oq.html


Posted by Cam, 19/01/2012 8:51:18 AM
He would say that, wouldn't he?
Posted by Bushie Bill, 19/01/2012 9:19:47 AM
In Gloucester, where large tracks of land has been bought up by foreign countries since 1980, is astounding. Gloucester Coal Ltd, now in negotiations with Yancoal (China), Gloucester Resources Ltd (US majority owned).

How can ABARES say there is little change since 1980? What about Shenhua (China) purchasing land on the Liverpool Plains? That is just a start.

Posted by Aussie, 19/01/2012 10:28:00 AM
While Cobb is right that foreign ownership of our sovereign land should be monitored at the very least, it should also be of concern as to why it is that so many rural enterprises Australia wide are so regularly returning such a small level of profit, if any at all, on such a regular basis.

While the Bushie Bills will argue we should not be granted any extra privileges to other buisnesses, Ag has its own set of unique hurdles.

We must find ways of reinstating confidence and profitability back into food production in order to expand and compete for assets against these foreign purchases of our lands.

Posted by Hungry?, 19/01/2012 11:27:48 AM
Considering that $200M is needed to be spent before going to a review panel...simply avoid this by purchasing land in $3M to $10

increments. Next thing you know all the land is sold up without a fuss being caused. Sometimes money cannot buy everything.....

Posted by food producer, 20/01/2012 7:47:57 AM
I don't understand "Hungry" - you want confidence and profit back into agriculture, but you want to increase the sovereign risk for foreign investors, resist their capital and access to assets.

I suspect that what you really yearn for is a rule that blocks foreign investors and gets us all back to the safe 70's: orderly marketing, FAQ everything, riding on the taxpayers back...

This ABARE report and the following two reports will do just what you and Cobb want: monitor the situation. If ag returns are as poor as you reckon, then you have nothing to fear - why invest to go broke?

Posted by ME Again, 20/01/2012 8:55:27 AM
Where, Blue old son, does the government "bleat(s) on about food security"?
Posted by Bushie Bill, 20/01/2012 1:44:19 PM
Sorry to have misled you@Me Again. I was not proposing to block anything. If I was selling out, (which I am not) then I would have to look long and hard at whatever options were available at the time. I also do not wish Ag to become a thorn in the taxpayers' backside. Aus farmers are quite proud that we battle on without subsidies but the strain of poor Ag policy structures over the years is beginning to show.(An ag MP with some IQ would be a good place to start!)The reason I advocate monitoring is in case of future monopolisation and market manipulation that may prove destructive in the long run.
Posted by Hungry?, 20/01/2012 2:02:26 PM
You're a good chap Hungry - time for a beer!

What about the rest of you blog warriors bury the hatchet for a bit and wish each other happy conspiracy-theory weekends?

Cheers!

Posted by ME Again, 20/01/2012 2:53:48 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Shadow Agriculture and Food Security Minister, John Cobb.
Shadow Agriculture and Food Security Minister, John Cobb.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you wear a helmet when riding your quad bike on the farm?

Yes
(16.1%)

No
(74.5%)

Sometimes
(9.4%)

Total Votes: 310
Poll Date: 16 January, 2012

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...