News 
 National Rural News 
 Agribusiness and General 
 Political 
 Turnbull baulks at early poll, considers passing ETS 

Turnbull baulks at early poll, considers passing ETS

19 Jun, 2009 05:31 AM
MALCOLM Turnbull has given his strongest indication yet that the Coalition could eventually pass the emissions trading scheme to avoid Kevin Rudd calling an early election over it.

In a confidential breakfast with the Business Council of Australia, Mr Turnbull warned that if Mr Rudd won an early election, his ETS scheme would "undoubtedly" get through a joint sitting of the Senate and the House of Representatives.

Labor's best chance of winning an election would be before next May, Mr Turnbull said in Wednesday's tough-talking exchange.

During the meeting, Mr Turnbull called on the business leaders to propose amendments the Opposition could put up when the legislation went before the Senate a second time. He stressed the Business Council should be willing to back strongly the Opposition's promotion of such changes.

When he asked for a show of hands on who wanted a double dissolution election that would enable the scheme to get through a joint sitting of Parliament unchanged, none of about 50 people there put up a hand.

The Senate is due to vote on the scheme for a first time next week. But the Opposition, which says legislation should be deferred until after the December Copenhagen climate conference, is trying to avoid a vote until the spring session.

To be a "trigger" for a double dissolution of Parliament and an early election, legislation must be defeated twice with a three-month gap.

Mr Turnbull got as good as he gave at the session with business leaders. Business Council president Greig Gailey said "most people around this room would say that the Opposition doesn't have a clear policy".

When Mr Turnbull asked Peter Coates of Xstrata whether the Opposition was perceived as having no position other than to put the emissions trading legislation off until next year, Mr Coates said: "That is the view."

Mr Turnbull said Mr Rudd could get his scheme through in three ways: agreement with cross-bench senators, agreement with the Opposition, or a double dissolution election followed by a joint sitting.

Mr Turnbull said business leaders should be supporting the Opposition's position. "You should be out there saying to the Government, 'The Opposition is being thoroughly rational about this — let's finalise the design of this scheme early in the new year.'

"The difficulty is that when we say that, we have your criticism of us. You have got to remember everything a politician says is judged with a degree of scepticism by the public … third party endorsements or disendorsements are extremely influential."

The Business Council was involved in a compromise deal the Government did with business and sections of the conservation movement in a bid to make the scheme more acceptable to the Senate.

Mr Turnbull said many Opposition supporters would be saying, "Rudd's going to get his ETS in one of three ways and we want you to try to ensure we get the least worst ETS."

An early election would be a huge risk for the Prime Minister, Mr Turnbull said.

"But there is no doubt, I think objectively, that his prospects of winning an election are materially better if he goes before next May's budget — because he clearly didn't take too many tough decisions this May and at some point he's going to have to do that."

Mr Gailey said there were still some issues in the legislation of concern to business "and we would ideally like the Opposition to negotiate with the Government and reach a bipartisan position which offered the best scheme and also certainty".

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
It might also be a good idea to let the people have a say over something as big as an ETS. 50 business people are hardly representative of the Australian voting population.
Posted by John Michelmore, 19/06/2009 9:56:32 AM
Mr. Turnbull is spinning in meaningless rhetorical circles because he doesn't have the courage to take on Rudd in an early election. Indeed as each day dawns it becomes increasingly clear that Turnbull is marking time in the hope that the unemployment figuires will erode Rudd's prospects. It was & remains my belief that John Howard's worst political blunder, was to treat Turnbull like a prodigal son. It cost Howard the election & will cost Australia dearly in terms of debt & long suffering economic destruction at the hands of the EU & US's global market manipulators. But, that's what the majority voted for & the minority must share the consequences.
Posted by Jock, 19/06/2009 11:41:56 AM
Turnbull the turncoat shows his colours. An ETS is the final nail in the coffin for Aust. Get ready for slavery. Please have a look at your future, wwwgreen-agenda.com
Posted by Loc Hey, 19/06/2009 6:25:22 PM
Turnbull and the Liberals need to grow a pair and stand up for what's right, not the best political outcome for Turnbull. More and more evidence is coming to light that man-made co2 is not the cause of climate change, and sooner or later it will permeate the minds of the ignorant masses that put KRudd in power and is pushing this ETS so hard. Then Turnbull would be able to say "I said to wait!"
Posted by Brindi, 19/06/2009 6:50:58 PM
Brindi - what evidence? A major reprot commissioned by Bush and just released in the US that the IPCC is understating the threat and the cause. What evidence - just stating there is evidence does not mean there is. You are being hoodwinked.
Posted by the lorax, 22/06/2009 10:46:41 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Opposition Leader Malcolm Turnbull.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
18 June, 2009
17 June, 2009
POLL
Q: Has the deregulation of the wheat industry's single desk marketing system been beneficial to grain growers?

Yes
(25.4%)

No
(50.4%)

It's too soon to tell
(24.2%)

Total Votes: 476
Poll Date: 14 June, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...