News 
 National Rural News 
 Dairy 
 General 
 Dairy industry now the target for Animal Liberation 

Dairy industry now the target for Animal Liberation

03 Mar, 2008 08:59 AM
Dairy farmers are normally passive people, but when Lynda Stoner from Animal Liberation accused dairy farmers of being cruel and of harming the environment she pushed the farming community too far.

And local farmers have come out fighting in defence of their industry and the way they treat their animals.

Dairy farmers have done it tough battling through deregulation and drought, and now the very essence of what they do is under fire.

Animal Liberation has come out strongly with an anti-dairy campaign.

They cite:

• Health risks from consuming too much dairy,

• Environmental damage from excess water use and

• Increases in greenhouse gas emissions caused by the production of dairy products.

While the arguments are strong and numerous they can’t deflect the fact that if the demand for dairy was not there, dairy farming would not exist.

After 55 years in dairying, Kangaroo Valley farmer Bob Cochrane is shocked to hear the attack on dairy farmers and feels obliged to stick up for his industry.

Mr Cochrane says he is disappointed and frustrated to see people, who are not associated with the land and who don’t understand the nurturing that farmers provide for their animals, attacking dairy farmers.

“It’s quite offensive.

"Farmers are practical people and people like Lynda Stoner and her group, who are ignorant of farming today, are rubbing farmers’ noses in the dirt,” he said.

“While I’m expecting this campaign to be a flash-in-the-pan thing we would welcome Lynda Stoner to spend a day on the farm and then I would be more than happy for her to point out the pitfalls of our operation.

“There is a global shortage of dairy products, we’re being encouraged by industry to supply more milk,” Mr Cochrane said.

Mr Cochrane has had a number of calls supporting him speaking up on behalf of dairy farmers.

“We care for our animals and the environment - if we didn’t it would be very bad management from a business point of view.

“People don’t see the nurturing that goes into pregnant cows before they give birth.”

Mr Cochrane says to meet demand, farmers have to selectively breed cattle to produce maximum milk.

He says many cows now produce too much milk for one calf to consume.

This could lead to health problems for the mother if she isn’t milked.

“It’s true calves are removed from their mother after three days, once they get the colostrum milk to help their immune systems.

“The calf is housed and fed twice a day with cow’s whole milk and they thrive to become replacement animals in about three years’ time.

“We look after them because they are our future.

“I see farmers as being well-managed greenies, who care about their animals and their land,” Mr Cochrane said.

SOURCE: Nowra South Coast Register

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size
Page:
1

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Mr Cochrane states that 'many cows now produce to much milk'.

Damn right he is.

I've seen the modern dairy cow struggling with udders so large it would have to hurt.

I've also seen the thank you these poor creatures get for all their hard work, ie: forced impregnation over and over, calves ripped away from mothers (for which even farmers admit how much distress it causes the mother), producing unatural amounts of milk until their bodies are no longer 'viable'.

And after all that, a horrible trip to the slaughter house.

I also notice no mention of what happens to the male calves.

He conveniently forgot to mention that one!!!

Posted by Bernard L Brennan, 4/03/2008 10:35:06 AM
You said, “While the arguments are strong and numerous they can’t deflect the fact that if the demand for dairy was not there, dairy farming would not exist.”

So the dairy industry only exists because we all demand it?

Give me a break please!

What utter rubbish – it has all to do with incessant brain-washing of kids (“three serves every day”) and instilling the fear of osteoporosis in adults – especially during the ‘Healthy Bones’ promotions.

In fact, countries with higher consumption of dairy have higher rates of osteoporosis.

According to Amy Lanou Ph.D., nutrition director for the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine in Washington, DC, “There is really no requirement for diary products in the diet. The countries with the highest rates of osteoporosis are the ones where people drink the most milk and have the most calcium in their diets. The connection between calcium consumption and bone health is actually very weak, and the connection between dairy consumption and bone health is almost nonexistent.”

Dairy is a cruel, water-wasting, greenhouse gas emitting, polluting and completely unnecessary industry.

Posted by Snyder, 4/03/2008 1:38:01 PM
Do all these people who complain, have milk in the tea, coffee? Do they all eat the dairy group of food?. Do they all eat meat? And do they feed it to their families. We all may hate the idea of killing of livestock but it is survival. What about the plight of the poor old vegetable. You take a potatoecarrot, a leafy vegetable out of the cupboard/fridge, peel him, cut him up, and put him in to a pot of water all while he is still "alive". Is this not cruel as well!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by farmer, 4/03/2008 11:01:01 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural Horse Deals Australia


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...