News 
 National Rural News 
 Dairy 
 General 
 EU, US reintroduce damaging dairy subsidies 

EU, US reintroduce damaging dairy subsidies

21 Jan, 2009 09:13 AM
With world dairy prices in free-fall administrators in the European Union and United States have reverted to export subsidy programs in a bid to offer some protection to their beleagued dairy industries.

But just how that will help world markets remains a mystery since it gives those with export product the ability to undercut prevailing market rates to guarantee sales preference, helping chase prices down even further.

New Zealand and Australia which together account for about 40pc of world export volumes can only be losers in this process since neither operate with the benefit of government underwriting.

A feature of the world market in the past few years has been the absence of significant stockpiles of dairy commodities in the EU and US and that has helped drive prices up as surging world demand had to be met from current production.

European Union Commissioner for Agriculture Mariann Fischer-Boel announced at the Green Week conference in Germany last week that export refunds for milk were to resume.

Farm lobby groups across Europe have been pressuring the Commission to reintroduce refunds for dairy products to help offset falling prices in internal dairy markets.

EU export refunds for dairy products were discontinued in June 2007 when dairy commodity prices soared.

They will be reintroduced for butter and skimmed milk powder (SMP) and all other dairy products including whole milk powder and cheese that were eligible in the past.

The subsidies will be available, commencing this week and intervention buying of butter and skimmed milk powder will also be kept open longer than usual to absorb more product.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The underlying message here which none of our bookworms will be able to see is that the free market cannot be relied on to feed the world. The hallmark of the unfettered free market is the boom/bust cycle. With food production bust means famine. Our modern academies deny it, but the principal driver for the establishment of the Wheat Board 60 years ago was the need to guarantee supply. Broken farmers cannot plant next year's crop. It would be the same purpose that is driving these new subsidies. Low returns to farmers will not produce sufficient food for next year. When this problem arose for us in the mid 1980s not only did the Hawke government refuse to defend Australian agriculture, but the NFF said "we don't want subsidies! We want the free market to prevail". For nigh on 25 years the NFF has maintained that policy in the face of failure, thereby hugely shrinking agriculture's share of the Gross National Product and the number of Australians living outside the metropolitan areas. This is why the NFF has been in recent times desperately seeking other means of support. Now they must chuck their economic rationalism and develop some sound, rational economic policies to rebuild a strong agricultural sector. Economic rationalism is not rational economics.
Posted by Ted O'Brien, 22/01/2009 7:32:47 AM
What are our politicians going to do - as usual nothing - why not start looking after Australia's interest and not their own.
Posted by Genazzano, 22/01/2009 7:55:45 AM
I agree with Ted O'Brien; it's high time to look hard at the so called "free trade" policies that have failed to deliver viability, let alone profitability in Australian agriculture. I have friends in the EU and I understand from their perspective why the farm subsidies are an absolute necessity and why the Europeans will never ever give them up. Their reasons are the same as Ted O'Brien’s but from a European perspective; stability, average income (no boom and bust), guarantee of food supplies, stable rural income – stable rural population, family farm is paramount; and additionally the Europeans have a serious concern that a struggling agriculture sector, similar to ours, is a national security concern. If Australia wants to save its agriculture and its farmers it must change its policies, and change how agriculture is represented to Government, and stop financing the peak industry groups from Consolidated Revenue.
Posted by The Serf, 22/01/2009 10:31:31 AM
Last year in the UK, Deloitte, a firm of agricultural consultants and accountants released the results of a farm survey of their clients who farm some 247,000 acres in eastern England. The results were disturbing. The main finding was that their average client, who farms some 400ha (988 acres), growing food, will face losses of $A240 hectare by 2007/8. Deloitte Partner Richard Crane said that the question was why farmers continued to produce. "In 2004 the cost of production exceeded selling price. Without EU aid, food production doesn't make sense to the majority of our farmers. Farmers need to compare current economic reality with long-term strategy, and that doesn't mean hoping that the commodity price will get better." The survey showed that UK wheat farmers would have to achieve yields of 10-11t/ha if they were to recover the costs of production—a rise of over 2 tonnes/ha. In March 2006 farm debt in the UK broke the £10 billion ($24b) barrier. Rural debt in Australia is $43 billion.
Posted by Roger Crook, 22/01/2009 6:05:26 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
EU Agriculture Commissioner Mariann Fischer-Boel.
EU Agriculture Commissioner Mariann Fischer-Boel.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Should Nationals Senator Barnaby Joyce try a move to the House of Representatives at the next Federal election?

Yes
(51.8%)

No
(42.1%)

Other
(6.1%)

Total Votes: 444
Poll Date: 18 January, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...