News 
 National Rural News 
 Grains and Cropping 
 General 
 Monsanto wants more Govt money for GM research 

Monsanto wants more Govt money for GM research

02 Dec, 2009 09:58 AM
THE world's governments need to invest more heavily in agricultural research and development (R&D), according to Monsanto’s director of research Harvey Glick.

He said criticisms that companies such as Monsanto were focusing solely on research that benefited their own bottom line had only arisen because of the increase of private sector research.

"Since 1985, public sector agriculture spending is down significantly right across the world," Dr Glick said.

"In the absence of public funding, the private sector has stepped in and is doing this work to develop new technologies in agriculture.

"We are the first ones to suggest that there should be more public sector investment in R&D."

Dr Glick said an ideal research model would have private and public R&D complementing each other, and flowing through into the extension arena, and the work being taken up by the farming sector.

He said such an arrangement would make best use of the strengths of each sector.

"The public sector is good at some things the private sector is not, and vice versa," he said.

"A well-funded public research division would see all of us involved in agriculture better off."

He said there was one notable exception to the steady decline in government spending on agricultural research – China.

"China has been doing a lot of work in a lot of areas, including biotechnology, and I believe further research and agronomic advances will play a key role in their food security strategy, so vital for the most populous country on earth."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Good on you Harvey Glick. More 'conventional wisdom' spewing forth from your corporatised, profit driven-mantras. Let's throw more and more scarce public funds at wonderfully successful projects like the CSIRO's GM non- browning veges, and GM field peas. What a benchmark of agricultural intelligence they were/are!!!! Either they didn't work at all, or even better - caused massive problems for the rodents that ate them. GREAT STUFF!!!! May as well try to get more money for more 'brilliant' GM ideas, rather than invest in silly things like soil and plant nutrition, sequestering and cycling carbon in our flogged and carbon deprived soils, and really getting a hold on dumb and irrelevant processes such as how biologically oriented systems, such as a biologically active soil, work. Now they sound like useless things to spend hard earned tax dollars on, don't they Harvey? The problem is that these luddite holistic processes look at the long term, interconnected picture, and reduce the vast amount of farmers incomes, flowing unsustainably, to the pockets of Monsanto et al. Sounds a bit grim for Harvey if this were to happen....
Posted by brett sanders, 2/12/2009 11:53:33 AM
Brett, you have said it all, there is nothing left to say other than, here, here, here,here.
Posted by ggwagga, 3/12/2009 7:08:29 AM
"We are the first ones to suggest that there should be more public sector investment in R&D." You Betcha! Glick. "GIVE us some more taxpayer funds so we can work out how to make more profits than ever! Not that we'll EVER pay it back when we do." "Public sector investment" Hah! Grab for scarce taxpayer funds decribes it better.
Posted by incervisiaveritas, 3/12/2009 7:17:16 AM
I think if you can lower the vitriol level a fraction brett, you will see that Harvey is talking about all agricultural research including the unscientific, plant on a full moon, ideas that you seem to espouse.
Posted by Dan, 3/12/2009 8:45:31 AM
Use more Australian taxpayer funds support the profit objectives of a private US company? The Australian public has already been paying for research Monsanto was required to conduct itself on the capacity for GM canola to contaminate GM free canola, prior to release (Rieger et al 2002). We paid for our researchers to conduct these experiments on behalf of Monsanto. Monsanto's already been getting it for free. This is offensive.
Posted by Madeleine Love, 4/12/2009 12:07:03 PM
Yes the public sector, or make that the pro-GM government, seems to be good at handing over our taxation money to an industry that makes billions of dollars and the private sector - read Monsanto, Bayer etc - are quite happy to squander that money with their sticky fingers so they can make more money. This is a disgrace to our government for allowing this to happen. Who is paying whom in this debate?
Posted by Vicki Wilson, 6/12/2009 11:33:40 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
25 November, 2009
01 December, 2009
POLL
Q: If an election were held next weekend, for which party would you vote?

Labor
(13.8%)

Liberal
(31%)

National
(34.5%)

Greens
(12.7%)

Family First
(1.3%)

Independent
(4.3%)

Other
(2.4%)

Total Votes: 1267
Poll Date: 29 November, 2009
SPECIAL FEATURES

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...