New figures from the ISAAA on the take up of genetically modified crops have been used to support both sides of the argument in the debate about the future of GM crops in Australia.
Pro-GM group, The Producers Forum says the release of the 2007 global GM crop statistics from ISAAA highlights that the world is moving on while most Australian farmers are being left behind.
But anti-GM group, the Gene Ethics Network, claims the figures show the GM expansion has stalled.
National convenor of the Producers Forum, Jeff Bidstrup, says the latest statistics show farmers in developing countries are "leaving Australia's grain producers in their dust".
"The ISAAA report shows that in 2007, the global area grown to GM crops was 114.3 million hectares, which is up by 12pc - or 12.3 million hectares - on the previous year," he said.
"We are repeatedly told by the doomsayers that Europe opposes GM crops; yet France, Czech Republic, Portugal, Germany, Slovakia, Romania and Poland all grew GM crops in 2007, and the EU overall imports massive amounts of GM soy and corn."
Between 1996 - when GM crops were first commercialised - and 2007, the growth in the adoption of these varieties has increased 67-fold, the Forum says.
Farmers in developing countries have leapfrogged Australia, with 11 million farmers in these countries growing GM crops – mainly cotton, corn and maize.
Over 43pc of the total area planted to GM crops was grown in countries like India, China and Paraguay last year.
Australian farmers have only been allowed to grow GM cotton.
"The huge global adoption increase demonstrates that other farmers around the world also see the value in approved GM varieties - but it is a sad state of affairs that most Australian grain growers have been denied a choice," Mr Bidstrup said.
But Gene Ethics Network director, Bob Phelps, says the ISAAA figures show the expansion of GM technology has stalled.
"For yet another year, the ISAAA inflates growth in the GM industry, boosts adoption figures and ignores the negative health, environmental and economic impacts of GM crops," Mr Phelps said.
"In 1996 GM soy, corn, canola and cotton were launched, with two new traits - tolerance to lethal weed killers or built-in Bt insect toxins but in 2008, just the same four crops and two traits are commercially available.
"Seven countries grew 97.5pc of GM crops in 2007, the same as 2006.
"And five of those countries are in North and South America, where most GM crops are used for animal feed or biofuel production.
"No-one, anywhere, wants to eat GM foods and if they were fully labelled as they should be, GM food crops would not be grown.
"The number of countries that grew more than 50,000 hectares (500 square km) of GM crops fell from 14 in 2006 to 13 in 2007."
Mr Phelps claimed a few countries have dabbled in GM crops but have dropped them "when environmental, animal and human health impacts appear", including Australia.
Despite the severe impact of the drought on cotton production in Australia, Mr Phelps remarkably claimed the diminution in the national cotton crop is in fact due to the adoption of GM crops and not the shortage of irrigation water.
"Australia's cotton crop shrank from 220,000 hectares in 2005, to 134,000 in 2006, and about 60,000 hectares last year," he said.
"GM is responsible for cotton's collapse as it follows the lifting of the 30pc cap on GM cotton in 2005, when GM's share shot up to over 90pc.
"Australian GM cotton is an ecological and economic failure."
* To view the report visit the ISAAA website.
SOURCE: National rural news updated daily by FarmOnline.