News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 Cattle 
 Cattle Council bid to beef up levies 

Cattle Council bid to beef up levies

26 Jan, 2012 08:00 AM
CATTLE Council of Australia is seeking to gain beef producers' levy funds in a bid to boost its operations.

The call for a funding restructure of the peak beef producer representative body materialised on Tuesday when newly installed president Andrew Ogilvie released a discussion paper on the issue inviting feedback from industry stakeholders.

Changing the levy payment system would require alterations to federal legislation, as compulsory levies are currently paid to Meat and Livestock Australia. Beef producers currently pay a transaction levy of $5 per animal sold, and the money is used by MLA for research and marketing.

Currently, the funding for Cattle Council is derived from membership income from State farming organisations, the Red Meat Advisory Council fund, sponsorship and government funding agreements.

Cattle Council of Australia copped some criticism last year at the height of the Indonesian live export crisis when most of the industry's reputation management was left to MLA, a function well outside its charter as a statutory marketing and R&D body.

MLA chief executive Scott Hansen has repeatedly stated that MLA will no longer assume the role of industry mouthpiece, and will look to the national beef producer groups to muscle up in their political lobbying and take up their share of the workload in fronting the media and public.

In a statement issued this week, Mr Ogilvie indicated that seeking a slice of the levy funds would assist Cattle Council in meeting this challenge.

"The Cattle Council has been working for some time to improve its operational structure, governance, funding and membership," he said. "There has been increasing pressure placed on our resources. We need to address this if we are to more-effectively represent the sector into the future.

"Based on Cattle Council's current workload and increasing expectations from the beef production sector, it is becoming evident that current funding levels are inadequate."

CCA's discussion paper also calls for comment on proposed changes to representation and the structure of the organisation.

Mr Ogilvie said CCA was not wedded to one direction, but would consider many options based on wide industry consultation.

"The preparation of this discussion paper for stakeholder consideration provides a starting point for industry consultation," he said.

"The ability to access a percentage of the cattle transaction levy as well as the direct election of a number of positions on the Cattle Council Board are two elements to our discussion paper.

"It is Cattle Council's intention to conduct widespread consultation in tandem with the development of a beef industry strategic plan.

"We are not sure exactly sure where the 'landing point' is in this reform process. However, what we are clear on is that this is a necessary discussion for Cattle Council to have with its members as well as the wider industry."

The discussion paper, National Representation of the Australian Grassfed Beef Industry, can be downloaded from www.cattlecouncil.com.au/national representation

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Cattle Council is supported by State farming organisations etc as above, and as result do not represent the on the ground farmer who has litlle or no say in the organisation.

Cattle Council , MLA etc need to be wound up and the whole industry restuctured so producers have a true voice

Last years experiences and the continued lack of decent livestock prices and returns to farmers means they have failed. Who wants to fund more of the same, failure, failure, failure.

AGforce, SAFF have all agreed with legislation that is not in the interest of farmers, they do not represent us either.

Posted by Archibald, 26/01/2012 11:19:48 AM
With all of the compulsory levy money that MLA collect from beef producers, why shouldn't the Cattle Council get a good slice of this large amount of money.

If the Cattle Council has more say in what is actually going on in the Cattle Industry, there would be a better chance that we beef producers would not be lumbered with schemes like the impractical, expensive in-efficient NLIS

Posted by Bushfire Blonde, 26/01/2012 11:21:36 AM
Here we go again, the term stakeholders, not cattle producers.

Come on you people wake up Cattle Council does not represent the majority of cattle producers.

Mr Olgilvie please tell us in detail who these stakeholders are?

Posted by Frank the Furious Farmer., 27/01/2012 8:30:09 AM
Just like MLA. Cattle Council want non-members to fund it. Now there is a good discussion paper for non-aligned live-stock owners.
Posted by PAYG, 27/01/2012 9:14:18 AM
MLA and CCA need disbanding and we need our industry de-nationalized. The reason CCA wants Government funding is because they have lost the support of the grassroots stock owner and their membership income is in rapid decline. We do not need these amateurs; they do nothing for us they support the animal rights mob and as a result the general population views us as weak and indecisive. They are a relic of the past and should be consigned there permanently. If the Commonwealth wants to know how we feel have a Referendum of Stock Owners. We want our Industry back and we want it now!!!!
Posted by The Serf, 27/01/2012 9:22:25 PM
Well thats it count me out - stuff raising cattle anymore - these mongrels need winding up, move on, get out, push off, shove over, get lost - GET THE BLOODY HINT!

All these mongrels want is more $'s in their bloody pockets - no bloody way enough is enough!

Posted by Stuff me!, 28/01/2012 12:30:59 PM
As a beef producer who has sat around the Cattle Council table and volunteered my time away from my own business, I disagree with most of the comments above. I for one am happy to say I want a well funded and resourced peak council to represent me, and the industry that I have chosen to invest significantly in.

It you have differing views, for goodness sake, stop whinging, get involved, seek election and do something about it.

I have to laugh when all the critics need to hide behind screen names and pseudonyms. Come on people at least have the courage to stand behind your comments!

Posted by Justin MacDonnell, 28/01/2012 4:19:20 PM
For goodness sake Justin,

Your whole shooting match is a Government construct by John Anderson.

If we as livestock breeders get involved inside the organisations we automatically agree that MLA and CC are valid.

Its your own membership of MLA etc that gives the "system" credence. As a result none of what you believe in are independent or valid organisations that represent the livestock breeders.

Posted by John Michelmore, 30/01/2012 7:51:34 AM
I don’t know where you’ve been in the last year but it couldn’t have been here; look what Ludwig did in the Live Cattle Export crisis, he just ordered CCA and MLA about like a public servant; just go look at s69 of the AMLI Act that’s the power he has over you because you and CCA are Prescribed. Are you saying that more money will or would have changed the live export outcome?????bullshit!! Ludwig would still have left CCA out in the corridor. You don’t get it do you, we want freedom, and we do not want to be shackled to the Processors. John from Tamworth give us a hand with this fool….
Posted by The Serf, 30/01/2012 9:58:14 AM
The "beef industry" is controlled by 6-8 large corporations.They have all the market power because they own the interface with the final customer and are selling beef every minute of every day.CCA/MLA has never sold a kilogram of beef to any one ever.If it wasn't for their statutory protection they would not exist in a free market.Cattle producers do not sell beef.We supply the raw input to these corporations whose main objective is to pay as little as possible for this input.Yet we are forced by statute to fund activities that subsidise the profits of these corporations.Stop laughing Justin .
Posted by john from tamworth, 30/01/2012 10:21:46 AM
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
24 January, 2012
23 January, 2012
25 January, 2012
24 January, 2012
POLL
Q: Do you think the government is doing enough to monitor foreign ownership of Australian farmland?

Yes
(10.6%)

No
(89.4%)

Total Votes: 898
Poll Date: 23 January, 2012

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...