News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Backlash at BSE ban decision 

Backlash at BSE ban decision

21 Oct, 2009 10:07 AM
The Federal Government's decision to lift its ban on beef imports from countries affected by BSE has outraged the Opposition and the Australian Beef Association, which claim the decision puts the local industry at risk.

The announcement yesterday also detailed that the Australia's "beef off the shelves" policy - in which all beef is removed from point of sale in the event of any local bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) infections - would also scrapped as of March next year.

The moves have the support of the majority of the cattle and farm lobby, and have been was largely attributed to a new report on the health risks associated with importing beef and beef products.

The Cattle Council of Australia believes removing the ban will avoid an inevitable World Trade Organisation obligation to pull Australian meat from domestic shelves if an outbreak ever occurred in Australia.

Neither the Government nor Cattle Council believe the move will trigger a flood of beef imports or put the Australian herd at any risk of contracting BSE.

But ABA president Brad Bellinger said with the Australian dollar heading towards parity with the US there was an inherent risk America would be able to export its beef to Australia much more competitively.

He branded the changes "a sell-out of the Australian beef industry under the US Free Trade Agreement".

Opposition spokesman for Agriculture, John Cobb, fears for the repercussions for Australia's exports particularly among two of Australia's biggest beef export customers, Japan and Korea, who are also the most sensitive, he added.

Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan said the decision reduces Australia's "unique position in the global beef market" as a BSE-free nation, and described the changes "a disgrace".

He said the Government's promise to enforce new import conditions and testing was based on a "flawed strategy" because, while stating products need to be BSE-free, Senator Heffernan argues there is no live test for BSE.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


RELATED COVERAGE

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Politicians only look after themselves. Let's just try our best to destroy the beef industry. Well done. Let's kill the industry.
Posted by shaun, 21/10/2009 3:51:03 PM, on Farm Weekly
It makes sense - if there's a single case and the old rules are in place the whole industry is shot. The old rules would make it illegal to sell beef if we had a single case! Worry about the dollar - that's the only thing that'll kill our exports and risk imports.
Posted by POKA, 21/10/2009 6:39:59 PM, on Queensland Country Life
This BSE move is in the realm of the fiinancial bubble. A few might make a fast buck but undermine the whole structure. The most important issue is to maintain our disease-free status.
Posted by Pat Healy, 22/10/2009 7:00:40 AM, on Stock & Land
The old policy is flawed, and the previous Govt knew it, and agreed to fix it up, but never got round to it. To now shout loudly is hypocrisy.

The idea that Australia should remove all beef off its shelves if we discovered one case of BSE is ludicrous. No other country in the world, including UK, has ever done such a thing.

Other countries have no way of tracing cattle - particularly the USA. With our systems, we can trace cattle in minutes and isolate a problem, why then would we want to remove all beef of all shelves right across the country when we know that there is no risk? Such a move would destroy any attempt to reassure our overseas customers that we are supplying safe product.

The removal of this dangerous and nonsensical rule is well overdue.

Before BSE, the US was free to import beef into Australia any time. Very little ever came across - a few hundred tonnes. The biggest risk is the value of our dollar. Let's not jeopardise the 380,000 tonne quota we send to them. In any event, BSE countries such as the USA will have imports decided on a case by case basis.

Posted by Practical Producer, 22/10/2009 7:35:32 AM, on Stock & Land
The amendment could have simply removed the requirement to remove domestic beef from our shelves in the event of BSE being discovered in Australia. That is probably what the NFF wanted but lacked the competence to achieve. Producers must stop paying fees to support this body.
Posted by 'Rob Roy', 22/10/2009 7:41:40 AM, on Queensland Country Life
Great advice, Poka and Practical Producer. Minor noise makers never do their homework - just shout shallow rally cries. Geeez!- they really are dinosaurs. It's the right decision - thanks to the NFF and Cattle Council.
Posted by g, 22/10/2009 7:56:48 AM, on Stock Journal
I love how the producers are completely against this but the 'industry bodies' who represent them have siddled up and kissed the governments backside about this. Good on ABA for having the guts to stand up to the government and say it like it is. If you arent seen backing the minister and his cronies - you can kiss your government-funded projects goodbye!!!

Just picture - it in 10 years time, when Australia loses its clean and green image, we will all remember that some stupid government pen pusher screwed our great industry for ever.

Posted by Farm girl, 22/10/2009 9:23:24 AM, on Farm Weekly
This is the best solution. We lead the world in clean, green production (interestingly, we say green and then the Labor Government denounced us as major polluters regarding the ETS) and our systems, regardless what the ABA and Heffernan dinosaurs want you to believe, keep us with this status.

Therefore, if these systems keep us on the top of the red meat export dais in the global trade, why do they not provide the same guarantees to domestic consumers in their eyes? They do but, with the political posturing that occurs on these issues by groups with minute numbers of members who use the media (who dislike them immensely anyway) to get a point across, the issues is muddied.

CCA and NFF provide policy and direction for the industry regardless is you are a member or not. Those that wish to tear this system down are not members anyway - they choose not to be, yet when issues go right reap the rewards. Brazil has the same agreement in place yet cannot get into Japan and Korea. This does nothing to neither damage our OIE status nor encourage the disease. The disease is almost wiped out - get a grip on reality and not something else before public comment please

Posted by BlueskyAgbiz, 22/10/2009 12:40:15 PM, on The Land

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Outraged ... Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan
Outraged ... Liberal Senator Bill Heffernan
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: Who do you think is the best person to lead the Federal Liberal Party?

Malcolm Turnbull
(46.4%)

Julie Bishop
(5.7%)

Tony Abbott
(10.3%)

Joe Hockey
(23.6%)

Other
(14.1%)

Total Votes: 760
Poll Date: 18 October, 2009

Most popular articles

Ray White Rural IRRIGATION CONFERENCE 2010
 
Rural Bookshop
 
NQR Facebook
 
NQR Twitter


 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...