News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 Live exporters to 'lose millions' from court ruling 

Live exporters to 'lose millions' from court ruling

13/08/2008 1:23:00 PM
A coalition of live sheep importers and exporters has taken court action against the Federal Government, claiming it will lose millions of dollars from a decision to reduce stock numbers on vessels bound for the Middle East.

The decision has meant thousands fewer sheep will be sent to various countries in nine voyages between May and October this year.

On May 12, the Australian Quarantine and Inspection Service imposed additional space requirements on the relevant vessels to help manage heat stress in sheep exported to the region.

They included an extra 10pc or 15pc space for sheep carried on vessels with open, two-tiered decks.

Solicitor Tim Cocks, for the companies, said outside court that they did not want damages or other compensation from the Government.

He said they were seeking to retain the shipping capacities they had always enjoyed, rather suffering the reduction.

A Government spokesman said AQIS had no comment to make because the case was before the court.

The companies are seeking orders to quash the decision, or an injunction to stop it being carried out.

According to court documents, the businesses include live animal importers based in Jordan and Kuwait, subsidiary companies owning Australian farming property or feedlots, and purchasers who earn management fees from buying stock.

Each claims a significant adverse impact on its business.

Sheep were to be transported via the Red Sea to Saudi Arabia, Libya, Israel and Jordan; and to Persian Gulf destinations Oman, United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Qatar and Kuwait.

The case is scheduled for mediation at the Federal Court in Western Australia on September 18.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size



Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
thank goodness the government is finally doing something about this appalling situation, albeit a very small something.
Posted by adl on 14/08/2008 9:26:34 AM
Hopefully this action will be successful. Why does the Govt. pander to minorities at the expense of the hard working majority?
Posted by R&R on 14/08/2008 10:10:32 AM
Just shows the true priority of these people is profit and not the welfare of the animals.
Posted by Clm2 on 14/08/2008 10:37:31 AM
The Labor government is showing it's true side now, if it gives in to a few loud mouths.

The live export trade underpins a huge part of the Australianlivetsock industries and these industries do all they can to ensure both sheep and cattle are well looked after en route.

It is not in their interests for them to ill-treat their livestock - and there is no benefit for them not to do so.

Posted by cal on 14/08/2008 11:48:54 AM
Why do overseas businesses have a say on what happens in animal welfare in this country?

Pandering to greedy business instead of hearing what Australians wants, which is NO LIVE exports, is the problem.

Posted by Honesty on 14/08/2008 12:25:24 PM
The live export industry cares nothing about the welfare of the animals, Cal - that's why the 40,000+ mortalities on these ships every year are regarded as nothing more than "collateral damage".

And those animals are the "lucky" ones - we have seen time and time again the fate of the hapless survivors. If you want to prop up your agriculture with this amoral, evil trade in wretched animal misery, shame on you.

And why do we care what the Arab importers think, for God's sake?

What about the 40,000 meat workers who have lost their jobs as a result of this trade?

Posted by Nicky on 14/08/2008 7:04:54 PM
This confirms that profit is more important than welfare. This barbaric trade needs to be banned - end of story.
Posted by Bernard L Brennan on 15/08/2008 10:46:00 AM
In response to this article and the first three respondants, (adl, R&R and Clm2.): It is the ill-informed squeaky hinges like yourselves whom have created this issue.

When was the last time (if ever) you boarded a live export boat and saw the condidtions these animals are transported under. They are well cared for under the supervision of a vet whilst on board.

If you really care aboout animal welfare as your posts infer, try focussing on the conditions the animals endure after they get off the boat in the destination country.

We look after our livestock very well in this country. The false perception that we don't is as a direct result of ignorant and ill-informed "squeaky hinges" who assume authoritive status, when they really know very little about what they are talking about!

Posted by CQ on 15/08/2008 10:50:38 AM
We export live cattle and sheep from this country due to lack of refrigeration issues in countries we supply. They slaughter and consume on the same day for the same reason.

No live export trade and these coutries don't eat meat. It is that simple.

Meat worker jobs have been lost due to ludicrous union imposed pay and workplace conditions, not the existence of live trade.

Live export sends livestock to countries which cannot receive and distribued chilled meat.

Posted by cq on 15/08/2008 11:55:53 AM
What a sick bunch these live exporters are. Now appealing against a government's endeavours to bring this bunch into the enlightened 21st century where there is no place for sadism.

These exporter of live animals, between 2000 and 2007, dumped in excess of 414,000 animals overboard. Shame on all Australians who accept this barbarity to satiate their culinary pleasures!

Posted by outraged on 15/08/2008 4:41:44 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: Do you support the creation of a 'guest worker' scheme bringing in Pacific Islanders to counter Australian agriculture's labour shortages?

Yes
(69.1%)

No
(25%)

Undecided
(5.9%)

Total Votes: 508
Poll Date: 10/08/2008

11/12/2008 | Farm lobby groups will decide next week whether the future of farm representation will stay as it is or be broadened to bring in the big end of town.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Rural Bookshop
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...