News 
 National Rural News 
 Livestock 
 News 
 US animal activists launch a counterattack 

US animal activists launch a counterattack

03 Feb, 2010 02:21 PM
THE Humane Society of the United States has filed a petition in Ohio to bring a ballot initiative that would force new housing requirements on livestock.

Ohio farmers tried to beat HSUS to the punch last fall by convincing voters to approve the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board.

Less than three months after its passage by a two-to-one margin, lobbyists from Washington, DC have declared they know better than Ohio voters, according to Jack Fisher, executive vice president of the Ohio Farm Bureau Federation.

"The enabling legislation hasn't passed; the board hasn't been appointed and the first discussions on what standards Ohioans find acceptable hasn't been held," Fisher said.

"And yet, the Humane Society of the United States is saying, in effect, Ohioans got it wrong."

According to Kristy Foster, Farm and Dairy, the proposed 'anti-cruelty' measure would allow voters to require the Ohio Livestock Care Standards Board to adopt certain minimum standards that would prevent the cruel and inhumane treatment of farm animals, enhance food safety, protect the environment and strengthen Ohio family farms.

This measure will allow Ohio voters to provide guidance to the newly enacted Livestock Board and set certain minimum humane standards that will prevent 'cruel factory farming practices' in Ohio.

New rules would force farmers to revamp buildings, replacing smaller cages with larger ones for egg-laying hens.

Crates for breeding pigs and veal calves would have to be replaced. New rules would also usher in more humane methods of euthanasia for sick and injured animals.

The Board would have six years to implement these standards. If the measure is enacted, Ohioans for Humane Farms hopes that the Livestock Board would immediately adopt minimum standards that address euthanasia and downer animals.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
A glimpse of the future for Australia? I believe in humane treatment of animals but if the pro-animal activists get their way they consider having animals as inhumane.
Posted by Farmer Dave, 4/02/2010 6:53:17 AM
For humanists, these animal nazis have a funny way of showing it - wipe them out now!
Posted by tigerdicky, 4/02/2010 7:29:28 AM
Spot on Farmer Dave... these groups (Animals Australia, PETA, etc.) ultimate objective is the total abolition of any animal exploit. That’s no form of animal raising what so ever. They have no idea what is and what’s not a humane farm practise.
Posted by Ben F., 4/02/2010 1:01:58 PM
Can we not give them a state of their own & let them implement their own rules? How long would they remain viable or would their enterprise be manageable? Give them a real job..... or give them some more wacky backy & let them tune into another planet completely.
Posted by Oh please!, 4/02/2010 4:12:02 PM
It appears very obvious that some farmers don't care about a bit of animal cruelty. This is the reason why animal activists are doing their best to put an end to all this hidden cruelty that exists within farming. The thought that anyone can support factory farming, live export or some of the inhumane treatment inflicted on farm animals, absolutely disgusts me.
Posted by Barker, 4/02/2010 5:39:42 PM
Barker, I am sure the thousands of starving humans in this world think the same way as you, I dont think!
Posted by tigerdicky, 5/02/2010 7:28:16 AM
Peta are reportedly opening a branch in Aus. Perhaps barker is one of them.
Posted by bill, 5/02/2010 7:38:58 AM
Tigerdicky, if the grain that is fed to livestock (which are then slaughtered for small amounts of protein) was instead used to feed the starving millions of people then there would not be a problem with starving humans. Do you really think the planet can continue to sustain the current animal based western diet?
Posted by Sally, 5/02/2010 2:59:40 PM
Yes that’s right PETA is setting up in Australia so get ready to start seeing major changes near you. Oh and tigerdicky, maybe there wouldn’t be so many starving people if the grain that is fed to fatten animals was given to them.
Posted by PETA 4EVA, 5/02/2010 3:10:17 PM
It should be normal that animals are protected from cruelty and kept in safe and as normal environments as possible. All farming should be "organic" as it is meant to be. Our animal welfare standards worldwide have degraded due to commercial demands and the drive to make food cheaper.
Posted by Vivienne, 5/02/2010 5:15:56 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
31 January, 2010
01 February, 2010
MULTIMEDIA
POLL
Q: What level of trust do you have in the claims made by environmental campaigners?

Total
(5%)

High
(12.7%)

Moderate
(6.2%)

Low
(21.3%)

None
(54.8%)

Total Votes: 1310
Poll Date: 31 January, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...