News 
 National Rural News 
 Viticulture 
 General 
 Wine growers slam $3.1b water buyback 

Wine growers slam $3.1b water buyback

6/06/2008 2:24:00 PM
The initial success or otherwise of the Federal Government's $3.1 billion water buyback scheme from licensed and willing irrigators has become a mystery, amid claims that the plan is misdirected and leaves many questions unanswered.

The government is criticised for not completing the buyback this year, exposing irrigators to a rapid increase in temporary and permanent water prices, and for spending too much on buying instead of investment.

There is further criticism concerning the absence of advice from government on what it considers to be a 'fair' market price, the consequences for irrigators who choose not to sell and the effect of the buyback on communities.

While the buyback process calls for grapegrowers and other irrigators to express an interest by submitting a tender to the Department of Environment and Water Resources' water purchasing office, there is no public advice about the tender periods.

The first tender period began in February and ended on May 16, and industry sources understand the government has accepted those asking for 'something over $2000 a megalitre'.

The figure is about half the payment that grower organisations expected members to ask for and industry sources say Climate Change and Water Minister Penny Wong has been told that Riverland and Murray Valley irrigators expect better offers if government is serious about the buyback.

South Australian Murray Irrigators chairman Tim Whetstone says communities throughout the Murray Darling Basin will be consigned to bankruptcy if the Federal Government persists in rolling out its water buyback plan over 10 years, with a catastrophic impact on prices in SA.

"Our communities simply will not survive if the government stays in the water market, artificially inflating prices for a decade," he said.

"The buyback needs to happen this year and the CSIRO has all the necessary data to identify what streams are over-allocated and where the buyback will be most beneficial to the environment."

* Extract from a full report in the June edition of GrapeGrowers & Vignerons magazine.

Send to a Friend
Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size


Comments


Again the irrigators are screaming. Irrigators will do anything to delay the inevitable changes that are brought on by over-allocation and climate change.

Over the last few years we saw the idiocy of over-planting of wine grapes - water being used on crops that could not be sold. If governemnts do nothing and leave it all to the markets, rural communities will crumble anyway, and they will take the riverine environment with them.

Engineering-based changes are too slow - buybacks are the only way to effect change quickly. I do agree that there could be some geographic targetting of buybacks. Intervalley transfers of water should also cease.

Posted by Barney on 9/06/2008 10:57:23 AM
1

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

Q: How do rate the performance of the Rudd Government after its first six months in office?

Excellent
(8.4%)

Good
(10.5%)

Average
(16.2%)

Poor
(30.9%)

Terrible
(33.9%)

Total Votes: 722
Poll Date: 1/06/2008

27/08/2008 | IF farmers are wondering what the new look Senate will mean for them, they should just take a look at politics in NSW and the behind-closed-doors relationship between Labor and the Greens for a taste of what might be in store Federally.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
JB Fairfax Scholarship for Rural Journalism