News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 AWI a "maggot in sheep farmers' backside": PETA 

AWI a "maggot in sheep farmers' backside": PETA

16 Feb, 2010 11:37 AM
EXTREMIST animal rights group PETA is appealing directly to sheep producers in its latest advertising campaign, urging them to pressure Australian Wool Innovation to cease mulesing by the end of 2010.

PETA says it is fed up with AWI's "doubletalk, stonewalling and broken promises" regarding the phase-out of mulesing of lambs by the end of 2010.

In a full-page ad in Farm Weekly, PETA argues that mulesing is cruel and unnecessary because humane flystrike control methods exist and are already in use.

The ad – which is titled 'The Future of Australian Wool Is in Your Hands' – states: "AWI has wasted farmers' time and money by clinging to crude and inhumane mutilations. It has become a maggot in the sheep farmers' backside".

"It is up to Australian sheep farmers to save their arses and the sheep's by taking the initiative to end cruel mulesing mutilations themselves," PETA Australia director of campaigns Jason Baker said.

"As retailers and consumers choose kindness over cruelty, the Australian wool industry's profits are headed for the toilet."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Who the hell is PETA to tell us what to do? And what is their real agenda?
Posted by tigerdicky, 16/02/2010 11:43:56 AM
Next time anyone has a mob of flyblown sheep, get PETA in to crutch or shear them. Better do the job yourself - they wouldn't turn up, never done a day's work before.
Posted by bluey, 16/02/2010 12:37:12 PM
Go away peta, no one likes you, not even the people in the city who continue to eat meat at the same or higher rates despite your pathetic attempts to stop production. The more you preach this rubbish the more the community with react and eat more meat.
Posted by Mick, 16/02/2010 1:13:33 PM
Since the current AWI unnecessarily stirred up the elephants in the room mid last year for reasons best known to themselves, there inevitably would be a reaction. Producers better hope that AWI has a sound counter plan established. Chairman Wally and his board must now walk the walk to back up his rhetoric to protect his levy payers from the likes of PETA.
Posted by piece maker, 16/02/2010 2:00:34 PM
Sounds like they have been listening to Sir George" and "piecemaker".
Posted by Ted O'Brien., 16/02/2010 2:05:42 PM
Peta is the maggot in the sheeps backside. The old AWI board got the sack because they sacrificed our industry to these parasites. Peta's insistence that they are more aware of, and more knowlegeable about the welfare of livestock than the people that look after them 24/7 in all kinds of weather and terrain, 12 months of the year is so arrogant that it takes your breath away. AWI had done entirely the right thing. Wool buyers now have the option of buying wool from unmulsed sheep, and no doubt backsliders like myself who have tried leaving lambs unmulsed will, when we see the incredible premiums that will doubtless be paid, see the error of our ways and try it again- If we haven't already mated them to meat sheep so we can pop their little heads off, and stick 'em in the fridge.
Posted by Will, 16/02/2010 2:35:41 PM
The sad truth is that AWI completely dropped the ball on the mulesing issue. PETA were always going to attack woolgrowers after Wally's arrogance and the complete disregard shown by the AWI Board for wool's customers around the world. AWI's board is completely engrossed in its own power struggle. Wally and his faction are fighting to keep Brenda as CEO and retain a base in Australia. Chick and his faction want a new CEO and a base in London. This infighting has lead to complete paralysis at AWI and PETA are taking full advantage of this. Ted, did they let you out for some fresh air today? Nice to see you are getting better.
Posted by Sir George, 16/02/2010 2:41:19 PM
"As retailers and consumers choose kindness over cruelty, the Australian wool industry's profits are headed for the toilet." They're already there sunshine, if the retailers and consumers want wool they are going to have to start pulling woolgrowers' profits out of toilet.
Posted by Qlander, 16/02/2010 4:06:49 PM
It is Peta that is the maggot in the sheep's backside not AWI. The old AWI board got the sack because they sacrificed our industry to these parasites. Peta's insistence that they are more aware of, and more knowlegeable about the welfare of livestock than the people that look after them 24/7 in all kinds of weather and terrain, 12 months of the year is so arrogant that it takes your breath away. AWI have done entirely the right thing. Wool buyers now have the option of buying wool from unmulsed sheep. No doubt backsliders like myself who have tried leaving lambs unmulesed and spent the entire summer clipping maggoty wool from their little woolly arses will, when we see the incredible premiums that will doubtless be paid, see the error of our ways and try it again... if we haven't already mated them to meat sheep so we can pop their little heads off, and stick 'em in the fridge.
Posted by Will, 16/02/2010 4:31:25 PM
Isn't it bloody marvelous what educated man comes up with. Close down the farmers, Result food shortages and starvation for the most vunerable. Close the wool industry and no wool. Use the grain to produce fuel and less food. Educate a fool and you get an educated fool. Definition of a fool, a man who has said in his heart "there is no God". Ps 53-1
Posted by Richie 10, 16/02/2010 5:53:07 PM
1 | 2 | 3  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
15 February, 2010
16 February, 2010
POLL
Q: Have your voting intentions changed since Tony Abbott became leader of the federal Opposition?

Yes - more likely to vote Coalition
(32.2%)

Yes - more likely to vote Labor
(9%)

Yes - more likely to vote for a minor party
(5.7%)

No change - still a Coalition voter
(42.5%)

No change - still a Labor voter
(5.5%)

No change - still a minor party voter
(5.1%)

Total Votes: 870
Poll Date: 14 February, 2010

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...