News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 AWI, PETA announce mulesing review panel 

AWI, PETA announce mulesing review panel

16/04/2008 11:08:00 AM
Australian Wool Innovation (AWI) has announced that a six-member panel of "experts" will convene shortly to review the Australian wool industry's progress in researching and developing genetic alternatives to mulesing.

AWI hopes the panel will make a positive contribution to the ongoing work in the area of genetic alternatives to mulesing.

Genetics is one important element of AWI's R&D program for alternatives to surgical mulesing which also includes clips and intradermal injection research and product development.

The independent panel will review AWI's genetics research and make recommendations, where possible, for additional R&D initiatives and for

fast-tracking activities.

In the June, 2007, settlement with People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), PETA agreed to stop illegal secondary-boycott activities. As part of that settlement, AWI agreed to the panel's establishment.

As part of the panel selection process, it was agreed that nominees be independent and that both AWI and PETA had the right to endorse each other's

nominees. Each party will cover the associated costs of their nominees.

AWI has nominated three panel members who specialise in agricultural research.

These members are:

* Dr Bill Barendse, from CSIRO Livestock Industries, Brisbane.

* Dr Ron Crump, from the University of New England's Animal Genetics and Breeding Unit.

* Dr Wayne Pitchford, from the University of Adelaide's Department of Animal Science.

The three members nominated by PETA are:

* Dr Jim Watts, prominent sheep breeding consultant and former CSIRO scientist.

* Dr David Scobie, agricultural scientist from AgResearch New Zealand.

* Professor Clive Phillips, Professor of Animal Welfare, University of Queensland.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

Comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
By cutting down the size of the sheep flock and giving more time to inspect and care for the sheep should be one important way to help the animals against flystrike. Also, breeding out some of the skin folds. There may be less wool but this would give less opportunity for the flies. Sheep are not indigenous animals so they need special care.
Posted by Milly on 17/04/2008 9:18:58 AM
Editors's note: Merino sheep aren't native to Australia but that also applies to the Australian sheep blowfly (Lucilia cuprina), probably our worst introduced pest.


Posted by VERNON GRAHAM on 17/04/2008 9:48:48 AM
Milly needs to note that the majority of current Australian people, animals etc are not indigenous. The major problem is that the majority of voters live in cities and sheep 'shepherds' have had to resort to mulesing to save their flock because they can no longer afford 'special care' such as regular crutching which is not nearly as effective as mulesing in preventing strike and deaths.
Posted by Common Cents on 17/04/2008 4:26:23 PM

Post A Comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.

6/10/2008 | In journalism there is nothing worse than interviewing someone with TB - True Believerism. But the rapidly changing world is turning traditional ideology upside down, leaving TB sufferers supporting a brand and not a belief.
NQR Subscriptions
 
Horse Deals Australia
 
Rural Bookshop
 
JB Fairfax Scholarship for Rural Journalism
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...