News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Cut costs by 40c/kg and sell 20mt more wool: AWI vision 

Cut costs by 40c/kg and sell 20mt more wool: AWI vision

13 Oct, 2008 10:14 AM
Australian Wool Innovation has today released a strategic plan for the next three years, vowing to increase demand for Australian Merino, cut the cost of production and find alternatives to mulesing within two years.

AWI chief executive Craig Welsh describes the document as ambitious yet achievable.

In it AWI sets a goal of creating an additional 20 million kilograms per annum (clean) of worldwide demand for Australian Merino wool.

"There's nothing to be gained by setting goals which are easily attainable," Mr Welsh said.

"We are in the business of maximising the return for the Australian woolgrower and the most effective way of doing this is to significantly grow demand.

"Our new business model requires our regional offices to liaise directly with the top 200 international retailers and clothing brands and we are already seeing this strategy paying off.

"I believe that while 20 million kilograms is an ambitious goal, especially in the present economic climate, I think our business model makes it achievable."

Mr Welsh said the other side of the equation was a target outlined in the strategic plan to reduce the cost of wool production by 40 cents per kilogram (clean) over three years through increased productivity and lower costs.

"By not only growing demand, but also trimming costs for farmers I feel that AWI will be meeting our vision for our shareholders," Mr Welsh said.

The strategic plan also lays out a target of providing woolgrowers with alternatives to mulesing in line with the industry's commitment to phase out the practice by the end of 2010.

"I am determined that we will meet it and have been encouraged by recent developments not only with clips but also the intradermals FSP 1 and FSP 2," he said.

"A fresh round of trials for these technologies has just been approved by the South Australian Government's Animal Ethics Committee and I am hopeful that the results will be as successful as our preliminary trials."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Why dont the AWGA candidates explain what they're going to do? Any plans or maybe you will buy some rock collections and invest growers' money in forestry schemes like your man did last time? Why do the stud merino breeders let their good name be used by AWGA? Will Roberts has completely politicised the breeders association.
Posted by Sir George, 13/10/2008 1:49:38 PM
How can costs be cut by 40 cents kilo clean when fert, fuel & labour (etc) keep on rising? The boys in the ivory tower need to have a serious look at actual trends in relation to wool production costs. (I would suggest referance to Farmanco profit series WA) Unless we see signficant price rises very soon I believe the industry is facing a very bleak future. (Merino/wool producer for 27 years. 10,000hd run)
Posted by steve, 13/10/2008 7:49:28 PM
After reading the AWI strategic plan, where data presented only goes to 06/07, it leaves me wondering what hope there is for the wool industry. To suggest that costs can be cut by 40c/kg clean (ie 30c greasy) to help the grower shows how meaningless the proposition is. This is the cost of one compulsory Fletcher ear tag! The whole publication highlights the lack of leadership, direction and initiative that the wool industry has had over the 20 years and the resulting damage. At least growers now can see (if they have the patience to troll through the 106 pages) the real position of wool in the world.
Posted by jerangle, 14/10/2008 5:55:51 AM
It's great to have goals and I really hope it works, but they must stick to the script and not let politics interfere, as so often it does with this organisation.
Posted by N. O. Mule Sing, 14/10/2008 6:54:52 AM
I can't understand why the wool industry is still allowing to be dictated to by PETA when it is proven by their last fiasco re the cows milk in icecream that they will not be happy while people are making money out of animal produce. Somehow they should be made an example of and ignored and let us get on with running our businesses the way we know how. In this big rural country an alternative to mulesing must be 100% effective, anything less will cause needless pain and suffering for sheep. This year we are using trisolfen with mulesing and have had very good results so don't think we are allergic to change but from what I have heard clips are going to be expensive and the sucsess varies from sheep to sheep which is not going to be good enough.
Posted by Ray, 14/10/2008 7:31:20 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
AWI chief executive Craig Welsh.
AWI chief executive Craig Welsh.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
08 October, 2008
03 October, 2008
10 October, 2008
09 October, 2008
POLL
Q: Do you believe that buying back irrigation properties is the best way for the Federal Government to address water shortages in the Murray Darling Basin?

Yes
(25.6%)

No
(70.1%)

Other
(4.3%)

Total Votes: 679
Poll Date: 12 October, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...