News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 No time to back away from 2010 mulesing deadline: WPA 

No time to back away from 2010 mulesing deadline: WPA

14 Jul, 2008 04:11 PM
WoolProducers Australia has hit back at WA's Pastoralists and Graziers Association, saying now is not the time to back away from the 2010 deadline for phasing out mulesing.

Instead, the WPA says unity is needed in the wool industry, as opposed to "division or populism".

"It is obviously disappointing that PGA has taken this view, but it doesn't change the pressing need to phase out mulesing or the commitment of the wider Australian wool industry to do it," WPA president Don Hamblin said.

"I believe there is very strong leadership in the wool industry and a very strong will to see this challenge through.

"Strong leadership is about doing the right thing for the industry in the face of opposition.

"Telling a section of the industry what they want to hear will not guarantee that we have a wool industry in 10 or 20 years time."

Mr Hamblin said he was confident that solutions to the mulesing dilemma will be found prior to 2010.

"The evidence shows that there a number of effective fly strike prevention measures either already available or close to commercialisation," he said.

Mr Hamblin was also concerned at how governments may react to the PGA announcement.

"I share the concern of PGA and many growers about the risk of State legislation taking control of the agenda away from farmers. 2010 is a grower to customer commitment.

"That is what makes this decision all the more surprising, because if the Australian wool growing industry can't rise to the challenge of phasing out mulesing in response to consumer demand, then government might decide it has to act, which we are trying to avoid."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
The date has always been the problem, with no replacement for surgical mulesing.

Secondly, the people/organisations that made the decision on our behalf, over 50pc don’t even have or keep sheep. Yet we have to live with the problem.

Why hasn’t PGA been branded as a radical organisation for disagreeing with AWI and friends. Every body else has?

Reading between the lines, AWI don’t have a solution and are trying to pass it back to the woolgrower as their problem.

Posted by Judas, 14/07/2008 8:42:49 PM
Perhaps Mr Hamblin might like to list the effective alternatives for fly strike prevention measures that are already available or close to commercialisation.

Maybe there are some preventive management or treatment methods that we are unaware of.

Posted by Bob, 16/07/2008 2:05:26 PM
Yer but! - no but! It's there fault! Not ours.! :^/ When will the industry wake up that Peta are sitting back laughing at the wool industry rip it self apart! Let's get on with the main game! Producing merino wool- the best fibre in the world!
Posted by ned flanders, 18/07/2008 4:23:20 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe the creation of an emissions trading system poses a threat or opportunity for your farm business?

Threat
(59.6%)

Opportunity
(17.7%)

Unsure - more information needed
(22.7%)

Total Votes: 480
Poll Date: 13 July, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...