News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Processors fear the end of wool 

Processors fear the end of wool

17 Jul, 2008 10:04 AM
Wool processors fear mulesing may lead to the end of the wool industry and have written to support growers.

In an unprecedented move, most of the world's significant mills have signed an open letter to Australian woolgrowers, urging them not to leave the industry.

"We sympathise with those of you who are caught between the PETA-driven demands of certain retailers and the potential death of your sheep and livelihoods," the letter states.

"It appears that either way risks the end of the wool industry.

"We will not allow this to happen. We believe there are solutions."

Emphasising the depth of the concern, 18 Chinese, eight Italian, five German and five Turkish mills have signed the two-page letter, along with French, Indian, Swiss, UK and Bulgarian concerns.

Amongst the signatories is the Associazione Nazionale del Commercio Laniero, encompassing all the Italian wool trading companies, of which there are 34 in total.

The letter calls upon the industry to intensify efforts to breed flystrike-resistant sheep and the use of pain relief with mulesing until such animals can be developed.

"We believe growers should have the right to continue mulesing any sheep that are at high risk of flystrike, on condition that pain relief, as approved by the Australian Veterinary Association and other animal welfare groups, is applied."

The letter was sent to Rural Press this week, via Tony Roberts, director of Modiano Australia, the biggest buyer at Australian auctions last financial year, taking 137,000 bales, or 7pc of all bales sold at auction in 2007-08.

"Without Australia there is no meaningful world wool industry. We must allow common sense and courage to prevail," the letter adds.

Mr Modiano said the names on the letter represented over 75pc of Australia's processor customers.

WoolProducers president Don Hamblin welcomed Mr Modiano's support for growers but added the best way for processors to help secure the future of the industry was to keep prices at a level that was sustainable for both growers and processors.

"We all realise the ultimate customer in this industry is the person buying in retail stores," Mr Hamblin said.

"I can see that Laurence is trying to reassure growers which is good but I'm disappointed he hasn't mentioned clips or intradermals that are being developed as viable alternatives."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Common sense at last. This statement will help to start the rebuilding of confidence among woolgrowers. Thank you wool processors for your valuable support.
Posted by Martin Oppenheimer, 17/07/2008 11:39:46 AM
How arrogant of you people to think that retailers in Europe are stupid. They have been enlightened of the cruel activities undertaken by farmers in Australia who mules rather the more aptly used term mutilate, and have chosen to demand wool sourced from sheep who have not suffered. A far more compassionate and respectful approach to the use of animals by any measure.
Posted by Bob, 17/07/2008 12:32:20 PM
Thank god or rather laurence we might still have a future & somebody still wants & values us. BOB your welcome to eat my shorts.
Posted by THE FARMER, 17/07/2008 6:19:04 PM
It would seem Bob has as much experience and knowledge in wool production as he does in turning water into wine! The tragedy in this whole debate is that the people driving the anti mulesing agenda have absolutely no interest in real animal welfare. If they did they would be assisting woolgrowers in funding the development of alternatives.
Posted by Brindi, 17/07/2008 8:36:59 PM
Out of the woodwork they come. Firstly the processors who are worried witless and now two farmers organisations have smelt the wind. How out of touch has been AWI and how in touch have Olsson and Co been. The problem is robust industry disscusion is in the public arena and is called dissention, that is if wool growers ever have a say.
Posted by mabel peyton Smyth , 18/07/2008 7:00:17 AM
Great! All we need to see is increased prices paid for wool to enable wool growers to survive. All the added requirements and costs come out of the woolgrowers pocket. Brokers and suppliers just pass on increased costs to the growers without any consideration of streamlining the wool industry such as computer selling.
Posted by jerangle, 18/07/2008 10:06:01 AM
The 'PETA" dreamers have a lot to answer to..................if their commentary were balanced, and even reasonable, and dealt with substantive issues, they would have some credibility. BUT, the international tabloid press gives them the 'stage' to twist the facts, and even the relevancy. A parallell is that the public relations agents of the international terrorists are this same press.

Remember SARS and then Avian Bird Flue---both were beaten to death by the 'press'...a feeding frenzy of semi-scientific misinformation.....both were meant to end humanity. We have let ourselves be ambushed by this press, and allowed a deadline to be forced down our throats, that simply puts too much pressure on farmers to find alternatives. Various 'leaders' across rural Australia have allowed this!!!!!

Posted by Sanders frith-brown, 18/07/2008 10:08:38 AM
Diddeley! I cant believe that anyone could spin a negative twist to this!! I applaud this group of processors for having the presence to positively reinforce their industry. Maybe it's the agri-media need to contemplate where their next meal may come from. Shame on your sensationalism Marius!!
Posted by ned flanders, 18/07/2008 12:43:15 PM
While the wool processors support for farmers is welcomed it has been a long time coming and maybe too late. It seems that the processors have suddenly woken up to the fact that wool producers are leaving the industry in droves and the future supply of wool in sufficient quantity to maintain an industry must be in doubt. The only real support processors can offer wool growers is to pay a resonable price for the wool. At current prices I can see little future in continuing to grow wool and running our merinos without mulesing won't be practicle.
Posted by Shane, 18/07/2008 12:52:53 PM
Mabel Peyton Smyth is right. I'd like to add, how does the AWI expect to increase wool growers' enthusiasm when they ONLY target high end markets which are known to be fickle and shallow?? Where are the $20 wool T shirts in Kmart, Best & Lest, Target etc..??
Posted by nbewool, 18/07/2008 2:42:42 PM
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
POLL
Q: Do you believe the creation of an emissions trading system poses a threat or opportunity for your farm business?

Threat
(59.6%)

Opportunity
(17.7%)

Unsure - more information needed
(22.7%)

Total Votes: 480
Poll Date: 13 July, 2008

Most popular articles

SPRAY AWARDS NEWS MREC



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...