News 
 National Rural News 
 Wool 
 General 
 Which AWI projects will be chopped? 

Which AWI projects will be chopped?

11 Dec, 2008 02:47 PM
Many of the present wool research and development programs funded by Australian Wool Innovation (AWI) face the axe.

Dozens of small research projects deemed to be unable to make a real difference to woolgrowers may end, while the big on-farm issues of lice, wild dogs, mulesing alternatives and shearer training are to remain as the focus of research.

  • Major AWI review to deliver more redundancies
  • Mulesing, lice, wild dogs, shearer and shed training core research and development areas
  • $120 million revamp of Australian Merino under question
  • Sheep Genetics Australia and Sheep CRC funding questioned

The massive restructure is now taking place after it was revealed last month by new AWI chairman Wal Merriman that a funding shortfall of up to $10 million threatened the company, with woolgrower levy payments and Woolmark license revenues falling sharply in the last 12 months.

"I can't say what will go because the board has not met yet; we meet next week," Mr Merriman said.

This week AWI announced the redundancies of several senior staff including corporate affairs manager Matthew Flugge, manager for ethical production and trade, Norm Blackman and manager of industry relations, Danny Pagoda.

All played key roles in dealing with the media, industry and government through the controversial issue of mulesing.

The new look AWI board meets next week after an intense three weeks of assessing where the organisation should be heading.

With a budget of $6 million and a staff of 15 people, the corporate affairs and public relations department appears to be the first cab off the rank in the rationalisation, but is not expected to be the last, according to AWI board member Chick Olsson.

"If there is true market failure we can invest and many of the present smaller research programs do not appear to pass that test. We need less projects but higher quality projects."

Mr Olsson said the $120m to be invested in revamping Woolmark through "Australian Merino" and "Superior Merino" could be redirected to other areas.

"Does Superior Merino mean that the rest is inferior?" Mr Olsson said.

"Verified Australian Merino does not appear to work given it is so hard to prove wool is Australian.

"We need to question what the real strength of the Woolmark is and work on it."

Mr Merriman has been an outspoken critic of Sheep Genetics Australia and confirmed it may be commercialised as was the policy of the previous board.

"AWI has invested about $15m into genetic work and our funding has one year to run," he said.

"After that it may well be time for it to stand on its own two feet."

He has even questioned the ongoing funding for the Sheep CRC.

"Everything is under review."

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
Spin,spin,spin... AWI have over $60 million, yep sixty million in the bank. And Wal reckons they are going broke and need to make drastic cuts. And the cuts appear to be just happening in the areas the stud breeders and AWGA don't like. Am I a bit too cynical?
Posted by Sir George, 11/12/2008 8:46:58 PM
Whatever projects AWI might "axe" it is desperately urgent that funding be found to engage in the promotion necessary to get the price of wool up to a level which supports continuing production.

Nobody should assume that this is impossible, even with the current global financial crisis.

Supplies of wool are so low that a viable price should still be achievable.

Posted by Ted O'Brien, 12/12/2008 5:40:04 AM
I was delighted when Wal Merriman was elected to his current position and I am aware that. at present, nothing is a foregone conclusion.

I appeal to the board, however, to thoroughly weigh up the consequences of terminating the funding of the Sheep CRC.

Via the CRC's Education and Training arm, we are seeing some amazingly enthusiastic and practical young people continue and/or enter our sheep and wool industry. To my mind, what is the use of ensuring an industry's future if there are not the motivated, informed young ones to take things forward?

At present they are out there...right from Year 11 and 12 through to university level. I work with them and I've studied with them (at UNE, Armidale, NSW) and every time I've been with them, I am re-envigorated and enthused to keep on working in this industry.

Please, follow the consequences through very carefully, before drawing a red line through anything.

Posted by Black Betty, 12/12/2008 7:57:40 AM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
04 December, 2008
11 December, 2008
04 December, 2008
10 December, 2008
08 December, 2008
MULTIMEDIA
26 November, 2008
POLL
Q: Should the Nationals split from the Coalition?

Yes
(48.8%)

No
(47%)

Undecided
(4.1%)

Total Votes: 606
Poll Date: 07 December, 2008

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...