News 
 State News 
 Property 
 General 
 Govt policies to hit Qld property values 

Govt policies to hit Qld property values

07 Apr, 2009 01:34 PM
GOVERNMENT policy could have serious consequences on the Queensland rural property market in the very near future.

The effects of both the decision to allow the importation of bananas from the Philippines by the Federal controlled, Biosecurity Australia, and the extension of a moratorium on regrowth clearing by the Queensland Government have been identified as factors which could hinder property sales in the Sunshine State.

In its April Month in Review publication, property valuer Herron Todd White (HTW) has suggested the Government decisions will have flow on effects on farm viability and therefore rural property values.

In summing up the state of the Far North Queensland property market, HTW suggests the Federal Government’s banana imports decision is likely to virtually bring sales of banana farms to a standstill until imports begin and the affects on local banana prices can be determined.

"If imports result in disease outbreaks then not only is there the potential for falling market prices but substantial falls in farm productivity, farm incomes and flow-on effects to local communities due to remediation costs and likely quarantine restrictions," the report states.

The April Month in Review also addresses the State Government's regrowth clearing moratorium.

"If the moratorium is ultimately extended indefinitely, this will only serve to devalue large tracts of land that have regrowth issues," the report states.

"The treatment of regrowth is regarded as an ongoing management tool of the pastoral industry and helps to underpin both the viability and value of the property.

"A step that can be taken to provide for certainty going forward, is the obtaining of a PMAV for the property.

"This effectively allows the land classified within the PMAV to be managed as required by the landowner in perpetuity.

"As valuers, we see PMAVs as an asset and no doubt the same is interpreted by the market in general."

On the Australian rural property market in general, the HTW report suggests things are still in a healthy condition as large scale local and international investors have identified the Australian agricultural sector as a safe place to "park" money and ride out the storm.

"Generally the agricultural fundamentals have remained sound, and depending on specific geographic market, rural property values have held remarkably well," it says.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
'PMAVs provide for certainty going forward'! Are you mad? Freehold used to do that! So much for certainty from this Mugabe/Bligh Government. They will keep going until they get the lot. Tell your city friends to brace themselves for empty pockets as export dollars slow to a trickle!
Posted by Concerned Queenslander, 8/04/2009 11:36:01 AM
Banning vegetation regrowth management is another tool that the govenment uses to achieve CO2 emissions targets, ie regrowth absorbs CO2 and therefore offsets a certain amount of emissions. The result is those land owners affected are forced to pay for the CO2 emissions reductions that benefit all Australians. It is unfair and inequitable wealth transfer. It also damages the management of those properties concerned. A shameful abuse of government power?
Posted by terry, 8/04/2009 1:52:30 PM
And what about the state of Qld 2/3 under water in flood. Why did they not send that water inland, the idiots?
Posted by the truth, 8/04/2009 8:05:32 PM
The worst is yet to come! Eventually, you won't even be allowed to cut a fence post on freehold property. Then, when we can't make a go of it any more, the Govt will sell of your property to some big bloke that contributes to their coffers.
Posted by Trugger, 16/04/2009 8:41:40 PM
How can we make a living with our hands tied behind our backs.
Posted by Qman, 18/04/2009 9:35:03 PM

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
Related Coverage
ARTICLES
MULTIMEDIA
06 April, 2009
07 April, 2009
POLL
Q: Do you think Kevin Rudd needs to eat more red meat?

Yes
(89.4%)

No
(7.5%)

Other
(3.1%)

Total Votes: 548
Poll Date: 05 April, 2009

Most popular articles

Advertisement



North Queensland Register







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Classifieds

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...